From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59471C63703 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229847AbiLHQEJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:04:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49512 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230018AbiLHQEF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:04:05 -0500 Received: from mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk [46.183.139.199]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4339B2AD; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 08:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.gigahost.dk (mailout.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.112]) by mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF03A1883A08; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gigahost.dk (smtp.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.109]) by mailout.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4E825002E1; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gigahost.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF2359EC0022; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:03:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Screener-Id: 413d8c6ce5bf6eab4824d0abaab02863e8e3f662 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 17:03:59 +0100 From: netdev@kapio-technology.com To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Ido Schimmel , davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mac-auth/MAB implementation In-Reply-To: <20221208133524.uiqt3vwecrketc5y@skbuf> References: <20221205185908.217520-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20221205185908.217520-4-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <580f6bd5ee7df0c8f0c7623a5b213d8f@kapio-technology.com> <20221207202935.eil7swy4osu65qlb@skbuf> <1b0d42df6b3f2f17f77cfb45cf8339da@kapio-technology.com> <20221208133524.uiqt3vwecrketc5y@skbuf> User-Agent: Gigahost Webmail Message-ID: <7c7986329901730416b1505535ec3d36@kapio-technology.com> X-Sender: netdev@kapio-technology.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022-12-08 14:35, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > So it appears that frames which get a VTU miss will still also cause an > ATU miss, and that's what you're seeing. > > The solution would be to acknowledge this fact, and not print any error > message from the ATU IRQ handler for unknown FID/VID, which would just > alarm the user. Thanks for clearing that up! At leisure, do you have an idea why it will encounter a VTU miss violation at random? I guess I must check if FID != FID_STANDALONE instead then...