From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464E8C2D0E8 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7F92063A for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="pnTh+wiw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390871AbgDCMzj (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:55:39 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:57000 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727882AbgDCMzi (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:55:38 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 033CtXOT078628; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:55:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1585918534; bh=zHg91WiJBWz2Fi4pC1UUIQ2mI/iVfDn7kpR8RVMHrdw=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=pnTh+wiwdnusKx/s6QDDG63eOAeCqPJeWl/5E7XuR7RX5Ozu2TtDuTeJyYUN6KK1m v7v6wNjS5PJgqKOKlWP547q3VIXRiMv/78F3mvjLMaVsJgrmaJFjMKpySL3ylnD73t 7W6hSUX04UajaPNAZVJ6CvRLZVyDZxtcaaHpnDpM= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 033CtXhs120281 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:55:33 -0500 Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:55:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:55:33 -0500 Received: from [10.250.52.63] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 033CtXfd095739; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:55:33 -0500 Subject: Re: Cleanups in "next" tree To: Pavel Machek , Jacek Anaszewski CC: , LKML References: <20200322115906.GA10623@duo.ucw.cz> <3a103317-b9fb-5d0f-6944-0114b9af1629@gmail.com> <20200402225745.GA9830@amd> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <7cce20f9-f665-2b96-2657-e489df87dd3f@ti.com> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 07:49:47 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200402225745.GA9830@amd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel On 4/2/20 5:57 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2020-03-22 14:35:56, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >> On 3/22/20 12:59 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I've commited some cleanups into LED tree ( git/pavel/linux-leds.git >>> branch for-next ), if someone wants to review them. >> You abused your maintainer power by bypassing the usual patch >> submission procedure. Please remove the patches from linux-next >> and submit them officially for discussion. I would have some objections >> to them. > I'm sorry I failed to meet your high expectations... But I don't > believe I done anything completely outside of usual kernel procedures. So I can push a public tree out and request reviewers to review that tree and expect it to get merged once the review is complete without ever posting the patches to linux-leds? This would be the precedent you are setting here as maintainer. And Jacek does not have high expectations he is just requesting that we follow the process as defined in the Linux kernel document Dan