From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977B8C433FE for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230301AbiJQS3B (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:29:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38144 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230273AbiJQS25 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:28:57 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x2a.google.com (mail-oa1-x2a.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E29F748E3 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x2a.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1321a1e94b3so14248389fac.1 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:28:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:references:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:sender :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=garS2H7hrtCQgK+3svjO+YNXLY2IJ6zIG7NN3iNx5P0=; b=FeT1M+Qd/AoRCTrToYB7hJdUTfTTHiVUYZhKijeJahSM0R08gh0hRomyuwFINfwEeo xJ2/UXU0xXlOF2dWc2tRkQuWW5V7u8gzUueG/IBZJaIR5/7Hy1kQt6Y9jdfdgJ6hj+G5 5AdVpN9NGV1YcMjtQ2KBkop+ynLBu9+CQsOR2YHW6PdNhGrWtqQTCokLbhGcfxIPJCPC +/2eWRhsy8lINhXd/FUPT4huKY8iBQzb97CIGoFyvFH7e3rEskHm6QhOkGOjn/GlVWcg LL5sOtHIOm5K23xNy0ksEJLfCn1rDN2LH5ITRMJJpDcUEkFfrsB3fTBIRJO+Nkp3c61h LH/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:references:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=garS2H7hrtCQgK+3svjO+YNXLY2IJ6zIG7NN3iNx5P0=; b=svpuOIQjYHmwvdr/7vsiqbba5tZrWgOpoTaeyIGrZoIovLb60WngC4/xcJjFJeBWa0 EwOhS08IImRXhTPPNFJj4tkv0ULbjvYOqtk/A/nxkZY4gy4x0YNiCZuayWCTChHt3xtf wGDA/mxbM+rHA6vL8ykIo9JeOMdkytIQ4ctWn09jl1VhvyAEnWOazTZLOuxGEG5VjUdB wAXj9RT/Szj5ok7fABPKjiUsVelPmTBfQTwyy8H2VkFMBbVMaw8O9n4ZvIgdAY1+EMVa zMJ9gje34L0oBKrTl3g0xaV30tdqK3/aXsYfyNWZvBMtGo05qiwGAZQCtA3ADFFR7Ix7 OzBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1pY48QNaeyHvY96xwXQ7B1Yrs8TXTAKTh4M9AJvVlPPhmNYg0Z 6q+BKUNzsOndEAk0Q8G0ZlQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7HAzSiVBoNXsEJBL4cUJSrWCREmwBnaySyn1XwbBr7+08F3TOF6/e6nPvsdMfLLFnpyv2crw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:fb8f:b0:132:8c58:39eb with SMTP id kv15-20020a056870fb8f00b001328c5839ebmr16467413oab.88.1666031336196; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c? ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v81-20020aca6154000000b0034fc91dbd7bsm4550961oib.58.2022.10.17.11.28.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <7e5e4c7d-07f4-6ccd-6796-cd6f021f222e@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:28:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Jones , Conor Dooley , Atish Patra , Anup Patel , Hector Martin , Arnd Bergmann , Lee Jones , Yury Norov , Andy Shevchenko , Rasmus Villemoes , Guo Ren , Jakub Kicinski References: <20221017123434.GA1062543@roeck-us.net> From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: Linux 6.1-rc1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/22 10:39, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:35 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> Build results: >> total: 152 pass: 152 fail: 0 >> Qemu test results: >> total: 490 pass: 420 fail: 70 > > Strange. You claim zero build failures, but then: > >> Build failures >> >> Building riscv:defconfig ... failed > > so I think your stats may be wrong somehow ;) > Puzzled ... the logs show that the builds for riscv[32/64] succeeded with no error, but a manual build test still shows the failure. Ah .... the build fails with gcc 11.3.0 / binutils 2.38, but passes with gcc 11.3.0 / binutils 2.39. I had switched my builders to the latter last night to fix a problem with powerpc builds. At the same time, the manual test I just ran still used binutils 2.38. That is interesting; I didn't expect that the binutils version would make a difference, but apparently it does. Comparing defconfig: 10c10 < CONFIG_AS_VERSION=23900 --- > CONFIG_AS_VERSION=23800 12c12 < CONFIG_LD_VERSION=23900 --- > CONFIG_LD_VERSION=23800 260d259 < CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT=y 297,298d295 < CONFIG_CC_HAS_ZICBOM=y < CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM=y 4134,4137d4130 < CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS=y < CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE=y < CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU=y < CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT=y 4140,4142d4132 < CONFIG_DMA_NONCOHERENT_MMAP=y < CONFIG_DMA_COHERENT_POOL=y < CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP=y The build failure is only seen with CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM=n, or in other words with binutils 2.38 or earlier. >> mips, sparc64 >> ------------- >> >> All big endian mips tests fail to reset after boot. The problem is >> caused by commit 72a95859728a ("mfd: syscon: Remove repetition of the >> regmap_get_val_endian()"). > > Bah. I had already archived that whole thread as "sorted out", but > yeah, the revert clearly never made it to me for rc1. > Yes, I saw a note along that line. The original reboot failure affected sparc64 boot tests as well, which is gone now. Maybe some other fix for the mips problem is in the works ? > But it should be in the regmap queue (Lee/Andy?), so it is hopefully > just a temporary thing. > > In fact, it looks like all the failures have known fixes. So here's > hoping that your list will be a whole lot cleaner by rc2. > Hopefully yes. Thanks, Guenter