From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751591AbdK1Hl2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:41:28 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:58909 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbdK1Hl0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 02:41:26 -0500 Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions To: Joe Perches , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" , Arvind Yadav , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Tomi Valkeinen , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <1511809633.32426.70.camel@perches.com> <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:41:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Wscb95YEGIldHscpRHRL3l86DFj97PgmVBuROC+CuSolOoYaLG+ 9hreFBS6g4kjYVEZq+L6noNE8CZmc+/ud/PmCs+ARLr5v6TBqKT9GdtiIs1Ej3nMqR933qs d9vEv5Eq8zVjshfhTKDRurPQTl5obKojdLq49QD4/66GPooW1fCbDdz87rRUdl/Pim8/dc7 lx32cIPQw6sA+/vxypFow== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fChXi9yGX7o=:egTr4cvk716lrtXbKTJTYO yvCqG8behPKSaZMHpc0gTFT059gYMesM09X9QSkhULLftO3qbT+UXnDhdbC5dVyRqS75djQEH lxIvTxFp/8iY0eu6re+EwN5FQQFyEul5b3kpP/V+sTgafo0qnsX3cpc0rsV6XXR2tN5J4xYDF mDONwOcJsdhgAXF54DOqosc+9IXJqrmm0BJ0i3yZhYo7SGnlb6qPJNDFvBH0czFwjTwGAuQsL 9m0Wgy/W/YMheNoDZwZQhCFQ4F0ouazJfXuUw+em9Mysz5ogepYcmyYavmveFm8439L2TEhfH ZWnXlcqph2B3oAuPpz92Zt0tIg7I73Hpe6hpoVp+BQf852RHGuoTNawt5leSY4BLWqY2G982q wxyrAGpRb47m19xPuILxbJEEUrIrAb6CESurynihNZw1u3nbYaKkKq4+kMCg/vlgU2UKPeQF8 u+D2pVUGGM+g1fdnfSU6Pieb8ri0GA02/otUtqU0YWGU9CJ5riXimXDRC7dpYHGpvoSpp307m ZZTgrjvnbddHw+I5Eg0TaU7OHRLNzL8T58buZnqwFB1+Hs8ZwG+Y0A4XZnswcA4RW4GaDRhL9 OraRZAfnTEy4Pggx7BJN7k+xAHdhddPZJz0XqiGjBeA0M8o8CpcfeRpf+IcPjd5/oXUSYzbPp 4HTIajy4/4XV3GEa5Nukuwo8Xxv5b82AbMMrFnURUR/iguNhOtCle8k16g9dqAZwhK3voGBFV KXY9eR8Yr/nX+E/q39AEjsBXWp/XVPTHWQa/7Eb3AslymOjzM76fTkJm9gsdHxsdWZfobiDO9 xE0RWzvWTGzzQJ8C28oF96V38P8HuEC5pcbXxH5jT5VqgXye+Q= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests >> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for. > > That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction. >>From which places did you get this impression? > You've gotten _many_ replies to your patches I got the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance for my selection of change possibilities. Some constructive feedback was also provided which might need further software development considerations. Is the situation improvable here? > to which you have seemingly decided to ignore. You might eventually notice that I react to special information occasionally with a big delay. For which concrete details are you still waiting for a better response from me? Regards, Markus