linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Denys Vlasenko' <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: only use ERMS for user copies for larger sizes
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:36:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ea44458b90b4d41a08ba9012818d273@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26eff539-7de7-784c-0c88-f1d30753299d@redhat.com>

From: Denys Vlasenko
> Sent: 21 November 2018 13:44
...
> I also tested this while working for string ops code in musl.
> 
> I think at least 128 bytes would be the minimum where "REP insn"
> are more efficient. In my testing, it's more like 256 bytes...

What happens for misaligned copies?
I had a feeling that the ERMS 'reb movsb' code used some kind
of barrel shifter in that case.

The other problem with the ERMS copy is that it gets used
for copy_to/from_io() - and the 'rep movsb' on uncached
locations has to do byte copies.
Byte reads on PCIe are really horrid.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-22 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <02bfc577-32a5-66be-64bf-d476b7d447d2@kernel.dk>
2018-11-20 20:24 ` [PATCH] x86: only use ERMS for user copies for larger sizes Jens Axboe
2018-11-21  6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-21 13:32   ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-21 13:44     ` Denys Vlasenko
2018-11-22 17:36       ` David Laight [this message]
2018-11-22 17:52         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-22 18:06           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-22 18:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-23  9:34               ` David Laight
2018-11-23 10:12                 ` David Laight
2018-11-23 16:36                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-23 17:42                     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-23 18:39                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-23 18:44                         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-23 19:11                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-26 10:12                             ` David Laight
2018-11-26 10:01                     ` David Laight
2018-11-26 10:26                     ` David Laight
2019-01-05  2:38                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-07  9:55                         ` David Laight
2019-01-07 17:43                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-08  9:10                             ` David Laight
2019-01-08 18:01                               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-21 13:45     ` Paolo Abeni
2018-11-21 17:27       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-21 18:04         ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-21 18:26           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-21 18:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-21 22:38               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-21 18:16         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-21 19:01           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-22 10:32             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-22 11:13               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-22 11:21                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-23 16:40                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-22 16:55               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-22 17:26                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-22 17:35                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-24  6:09           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ea44458b90b4d41a08ba9012818d273@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).