From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932688AbaLBBBq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:01:46 -0500
Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:55198 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754193AbaLBBBo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:01:44 -0500
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code
References: <37310416.jZXoh5nfSC@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:01:40 -0800
In-Reply-To: <37310416.jZXoh5nfSC@vostro.rjw.lan> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message
	of "Thu, 27 Nov 2014 01:37:13 +0100")
Message-ID: <7hd28250gb.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
> After commit b2b49ccbdd54 "PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is
> selected" (currently in Linux next) CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is set whenever
> CONFIG_PM is set, so CONFIG_PM can be used in #ifdefs instead of
> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME which simplifies things in quite a few cases.
>
> For this reason, the following patches modify some core code to use
> CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME.
>
> [1/4] Drop a macro which is redundant after the above commit.
> [2/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the core device PM code.
> [3/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the ACPI core.
> [4/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the PCI core.
>
> They build for me for all of the relevant combinations of options (on x86),
> but more testing (on the other architectures) would be welcome.

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>

I gave this a quick boot test on all the OMAP boards I have, and it's
booting fine. As soon as this hits linux-next, it will be boot tested on
a pile of different ARM platforms, and will let you know what happens.

Kevin