From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753383AbaJTVbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:31:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:65098 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752835AbaJTVbV (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:31:21 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: "jinkun.hong" Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org, Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Ulf Hansson , Jack Dai Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform References: <1413795824-3453-1-git-send-email-jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com> <1413795824-3453-2-git-send-email-jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:31:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1413795824-3453-2-git-send-email-jinkun.hong@rock-chips.com> (jinkun hong's message of "Mon, 20 Oct 2014 02:03:41 -0700") Message-ID: <7hppdme8d6.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "jinkun.hong" writes: > From: "jinkun.hong" > > Add power domain drivers based on generic power domain for Rockchip platform, > and support RK3288. > > Signed-off-by: Jack Dai > Signed-off-by: jinkun.hong [...] > +static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct rockchip_domain *pd, > + bool idle) > +{ > + u32 idle_mask = BIT(pd->idle_shift); > + u32 idle_target = idle << (pd->idle_shift); > + u32 ack_mask = BIT(pd->ack_shift); > + u32 ack_target = idle << (pd->ack_shift); > + unsigned int mask = BIT(pd->req_shift); > + unsigned int val; > + unsigned long flags; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pd->idle_lock, flags); > + val = (idle) ? mask : 0; > + regmap_update_bits(pd->regmap_pmu, REQ_OFFSET, mask, val); > + dsb(); A summary of the locking and barriers here (or in changelog) would be helpful for reviewers to verify you're protecting what you need to protect. > + do { > + regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, ACK_OFFSET, &val); > + } while ((val & ack_mask) != ack_target); > + > + do { > + regmap_read(pd->regmap_pmu, IDLE_OFFSET, &val); > + } while ((val & idle_mask) != idle_target); > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pd->idle_lock, flags); These IRQ-disabled while loops look like opportunities to lockup the system. Maybe add a timeout or a maximum number of tries? > + return 0; > +} Kevin