From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95358C43219 for ; Thu, 2 May 2019 18:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656C220645 for ; Thu, 2 May 2019 18:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="TI91P15e" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726397AbfEBS5V (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 14:57:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:41048 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726175AbfEBS5V (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 May 2019 14:57:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id f6so1466212pgs.8 for ; Thu, 02 May 2019 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=lM2c+tlo6jGaS6GcPDKA87rxkv7bKTgFNvNaS30BO0w=; b=TI91P15erL2OywYjQHKmIyJKBc6sPfbma4Qr9Fh0sTkr/TzyaepILFifwYW4g3wWaw JuJPUAw4UCajVjqYmP0wxQ4QClyaC1XNagHXWS8h3ToDYO6hg5yh/bnRCdy2zSZpUXIF +ZrwD3wVO9CmImJ6Cr65rI0qa09e2fyN1HhuaRJcY8jarKy4cgoU5rDr7ewq9l9WpxVM UnfLfaw/exsvG2xp7cpGC3033uhM41JUT8rpyrK/C29Hn+61Jm4tlyynwE0NkdVriH1A Pvav5x2WyCk2Er31bwKzupa2n2HetnuU0Cf+9naP7mL/8eBllYDQq7WXm98G685XPEDf cTdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=lM2c+tlo6jGaS6GcPDKA87rxkv7bKTgFNvNaS30BO0w=; b=DOnIhHDoSOhjjAD3xnrPwkvgw+RfX9tMCQ8KAXKtjHxWXsrkLzn1EqgJDq6xnmuWYY Ims40Ds1quh9oG6ujx6+3/j0dENeiBan1kja4pZ3xh2VANtU+7ABKd3EwRVQ5Yibxj5K 1EAxvSCCveHBQSqIop+3atgosE94MCAoZ7QjnReGUDl+Aq/r3NFJv+dZlbrPL9WMISsK /EgF6m7cAak1+dR1YcXu2GgCbXBW1WWLb1ymzrwFywdmLg3HWxC5Im12bgJGg71oeZGm iVWtE2C9XUPXaT7t3EPTe6XRzDUHxoiyMGOqQS1iryyFVSLK06O6euW4gWGeb32cSELE RGXA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7eRmh2dnlfLcgNAKV25ouf2+ZwwSS9GQkO+mP9wlm8UfsaPnN jvqvPS8ARkHbywyOK+ISl6PrQA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqymPePW8yUoH5ZJ85MmB2vDe8cjepG/rf5Xz4mWP/mQIgzpZMZjapJeyzFwZOJiaQm+QroUbA== X-Received: by 2002:a65:608a:: with SMTP id t10mr5631142pgu.125.1556823440489; Thu, 02 May 2019 11:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2601:602:9200:a1a5:e50d:c7fa:92aa:c53d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j22sm30688288pfi.139.2019.05.02.11.57.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 May 2019 11:57:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Hilman To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-serial\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-riscv\@lists.infradead.org" , "gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] tty: serial: add DT bindings and serial driver for the SiFive FU540 UART In-Reply-To: References: <20190413020111.23400-1-paul.walmsley@sifive.com> <7hmukmew5j.fsf@baylibre.com> <883f3d5f-9b04-1435-30d3-2b48ab7eb76d@wdc.com> <7h5zr9dcsi.fsf@baylibre.com> <7htvetbupi.fsf@baylibre.com> Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 11:57:18 -0700 Message-ID: <7hsgtwlm5t.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Walmsley writes: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Looks like Paul has so far only tested this with BBL + FSBL, so I think >> I'll wait to hear from him how that setup might be different from using >> OpenSBI + u-boot. > > I'd recommend testing the DT patches with BBL and the open-source FSBL. > That's the traditional way of booting RISC-V Linux systems. OK, but as you know, not the tradiaional way of booting most other linux systems. ;) I'm working on getting RISC-V supported in kernelCI in a fully-automated way, and I don't currently have the time to add add support for BBL+FSBL to kernelCI automation tooling, so having u-boot support is the best way to get support in kernelCI, IMO. Kevin