linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	smuckle@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] cpufreq: Store sorted frequency table
Date: Wed,  1 Jun 2016 16:09:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8094732e9276cd108a40e0e88643e408257d030c.1464777376.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1464777376.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1464777376.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The drivers aren't required to provide a sorted frequency table today,
and its not optimal to work on an unsorted freq table.

To simplify and improve code performance, create a frequency table
within core and keep it sorted in ascending order.

Note that this should eventually replace policy->freq_table itself,
which isn't done currently as few drivers will break due to that.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c    | 23 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/cpufreq.h      |  3 ++
 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 07c933c6c29a..799e03daa4a3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1137,6 +1137,16 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool notify)
 	kfree(policy);
 }
 
+static void cpufreq_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	if (!cpufreq_driver->exit)
+		return;
+
+	cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
+	free_sorted_freq_table(policy);
+	policy->freq_table = NULL;
+}
+
 static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
@@ -1178,6 +1188,10 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 		goto out_free_policy;
 	}
 
+	ret = create_sorted_freq_table(policy);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_exit_policy;
+
 	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 	if (new_policy) {
@@ -1291,9 +1305,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 
 out_exit_policy:
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
-
-	if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
-		cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
+	cpufreq_policy_exit(policy);
 out_free_policy:
 	cpufreq_policy_free(policy, !new_policy);
 	return ret;
@@ -1378,10 +1390,7 @@ static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 	 * since this is a core component, and is essential for the
 	 * subsequent light-weight ->init() to succeed.
 	 */
-	if (cpufreq_driver->exit) {
-		cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
-		policy->freq_table = NULL;
-	}
+	cpufreq_policy_exit(policy);
 
 unlock:
 	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index eac8bcbdaad1..d536136c8e1f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 
 /*********************************************************************
  *                     FREQUENCY TABLE HELPERS                       *
@@ -297,6 +298,72 @@ struct freq_attr *cpufreq_generic_attr[] = {
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_attr);
 
+static int next_larger(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq,
+		       struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
+	unsigned int next_freq = ~0;
+	int index = -EINVAL;
+
+	cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+		if (pos->frequency <= freq)
+			continue;
+
+		if (next_freq > pos->frequency) {
+			next_freq = pos->frequency;
+			index = pos - table;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return index;
+}
+
+void free_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	kfree(policy->sorted_freq_table);
+	policy->sorted_freq_table = NULL;
+}
+
+int create_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *new_table;
+	unsigned int freq, index, i, count = 0;
+	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
+
+	if (!table)
+		return 0;
+
+	cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table)
+		count++;
+
+	/* Extra entry for CPUFREQ_TABLE_END */
+	count++;
+
+	new_table = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*new_table), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!new_table)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (i = 0, freq = 0; i < count - 1; i++) {
+		index = next_larger(policy, freq, table);
+		if (index == -EINVAL)
+			break;
+
+		/*
+		 * driver_data of the sorted table points to the index of the
+		 * unsorted table.
+		 */
+		new_table[i].driver_data = index;
+		new_table[i].frequency = table[index].frequency;
+
+		freq = table[index].frequency;
+	}
+
+	new_table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+	policy->sorted_freq_table = new_table;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index c378776628b4..5e23eed2252c 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
 
 	struct cpufreq_user_policy user_policy;
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table	*freq_table;
+	struct cpufreq_frequency_table	*sorted_freq_table;
 
 	struct list_head        policy_list;
 	struct kobject		kobj;
@@ -592,6 +593,8 @@ static inline void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
 
 int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				    struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
+int create_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+void free_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 
 int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				   struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

       reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1464777376.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2016-06-01 10:39 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-06-01 10:39 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_target() Viresh Kumar
2016-06-01 19:46   ` Steve Muckle
2016-06-02  1:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-06-02 18:28       ` Steve Muckle
2016-06-03  3:16         ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8094732e9276cd108a40e0e88643e408257d030c.1464777376.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=smuckle@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).