linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] nSVM: use vmcb_save_area_cached in nested_vmcb_valid_sregs()
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:48:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <815fa9d32621244331dfe630a28f3cbf84042ec1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211011143702.1786568-5-eesposit@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 10:36 -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> Now that struct vmcb_save_area_cached contains the required
> vmcb fields values (done in nested_load_save_from_vmcb12()),
> check them to see if they are correct in nested_vmcb_valid_sregs().
> 
> Since we are always checking for the nested struct, it is enough
> to have only the vcpu as parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index f6030a202bc5..d07cd4b88acd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -230,9 +230,10 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_check_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  }
>  
>  /* Common checks that apply to both L1 and L2 state.  */
> -static bool nested_vmcb_valid_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -				    struct vmcb_save_area *save)
> +static bool nested_vmcb_valid_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +	struct vmcb_save_area_cached *save = &svm->nested.save;
>  	/*
>  	 * FIXME: these should be done after copying the fields,
>  	 * to avoid TOC/TOU races.  For these save area checks
> @@ -658,7 +659,7 @@ int nested_svm_vmrun(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	nested_copy_vmcb_control_to_cache(svm, &vmcb12->control);
>  	nested_copy_vmcb_save_to_cache(svm, &vmcb12->save);
>  
> -	if (!nested_vmcb_valid_sregs(vcpu, &vmcb12->save) ||
> +	if (!nested_vmcb_valid_sregs(vcpu) ||
>  	    !nested_vmcb_check_controls(vcpu, &svm->nested.ctl)) {
>  		vmcb12->control.exit_code    = SVM_EXIT_ERR;
>  		vmcb12->control.exit_code_hi = 0;
> @@ -1355,11 +1356,12 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * Validate host state saved from before VMRUN (see
>  	 * nested_svm_check_permissions).
>  	 */
> +	nested_copy_vmcb_save_to_cache(svm, save);


>  	if (!(save->cr0 & X86_CR0_PG) ||
>  	    !(save->cr0 & X86_CR0_PE) ||
>  	    (save->rflags & X86_EFLAGS_VM) ||
> -	    !nested_vmcb_valid_sregs(vcpu, save))
> -		goto out_free;
> +	    !nested_vmcb_valid_sregs(vcpu))
> +		goto out_free_save;

The two changes from above can't be done like that sadly.

We cache only vmcb12 because it comes from the guest which is untrusted.

Here we validate the L1's saved host state which is (once again,
SVM nested state is confused), the 'save' variable.
That state is not guest controlled, but here we validate it
to avoid trusting the KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE caller.

I guess we can copy this to an extra 'struct vmcb_save_area_cached' on stack (this struct is small),
and then pass its address to nested_vmcb_valid_sregs (or better to __nested_vmcb_valid_sregs,
so that nested_vmcb_valid_sregs could still take one parameter, but delegate
its work to __nested_vmcb_valid_sregs with two parameters.

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * While the nested guest CR3 is already checked and set by
> @@ -1371,7 +1373,7 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	ret = nested_svm_load_cr3(&svm->vcpu, vcpu->arch.cr3,
>  				  nested_npt_enabled(svm), false);
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
> -		goto out_free;
> +		goto out_free_save;
>  
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1395,12 +1397,15 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	svm_copy_vmrun_state(&svm->vmcb01.ptr->save, save);
>  	nested_copy_vmcb_control_to_cache(svm, ctl);
> -	nested_copy_vmcb_save_to_cache(svm, save);
>  
>  	svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->nested.vmcb02);
>  	nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(svm);
>  	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, vcpu);
>  	ret = 0;
> +
> +out_free_save:
> +	memset(&svm->nested.save, 0, sizeof(struct vmcb_save_area_cached));
> +

This won't be needed if we don't touch svm->nested.save.

>  out_free:
>  	kfree(save);
>  	kfree(ctl);


Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-22 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-11 14:36 [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: nSVM: avoid TOC/TOU race when checking vmcb12 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: nSVM: move nested_vmcb_check_cr3_cr4 logic in nested_vmcb_valid_sregs Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] nSVM: introduce smv->nested.save to cache save area fields Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22 14:46   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] nSVM: rename nested_load_control_from_vmcb12 in nested_copy_vmcb_control_to_cache Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22 14:46   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] nSVM: use vmcb_save_area_cached in nested_vmcb_valid_sregs() Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22  7:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-22 13:48     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22 14:48   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] nSVM: use svm->nested.save to load vmcb12 registers and avoid TOC/TOU races Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22 14:48   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-11 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] nSVM: introduce struct vmcb_ctrl_area_cached Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22 14:49   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-11 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] nSVM: use vmcb_ctrl_area_cached instead of vmcb_control_area in struct svm_nested_state Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22  7:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-22 14:50   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-10-11 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] nSVM: remove unnecessary parameter in nested_vmcb_check_controls Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-10-22 14:51   ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=815fa9d32621244331dfe630a28f3cbf84042ec1.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).