From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263299AbTDNOYy (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:24:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263300AbTDNOYx (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:24:53 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:59339 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263299AbTDNOYx (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:24:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 07:36:39 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Bryan Shumsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Memory mapped files question Message-ID: <8180000.1050330998@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <002101c30239$fc0ae630$fe64a8c0@webserver> References: <002101c30239$fc0ae630$fe64a8c0@webserver> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hi, everyone. I'm running into a problem that I hope someone else has seen, > and maybe can help solve. We're using the mmap system function for memory > mapped files, but our updates never get flushed until we munmap or msysnc. > Are we missing something? Is there a tunable parameter in the kernel or > filing system that can be set to flag these updates as 'write required'? This was discussed about a week ago on either linux-kernel or linux-mm. The short answer is "yes, that's deliberate", but an archive search would probably be fruitful. M.