Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mtd: spi-nor: core: run calibration when initialization is done

["Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>]

On 6/27/22 11:14, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On 18/05/22 10:51AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 5/18/22 09:56, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>>> On 18/05/22 09:19AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>>> Hi Pratyush,
>>>>
>>>> p.yadav@ti.com wrote on Wed, 18 May 2022 11:37:05 +0530:
>>>>
>>>>> +Cedric
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/05/22 04:02PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Pratyush,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> p.yadav@ti.com wrote on Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:42:13 +0530:
>>>>>>> Once the flash is initialized tell the controller it can run
>>>>>>> calibration procedures if needed. This can be useful when calibration is
>>>>>>> needed to run at higher clock speeds.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>    drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>>>>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>>>>>>> index 88888df009f0..e0cbcaf1be89 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>>>>>>> @@ -3650,6 +3650,7 @@ static int spi_nor_probe(struct spi_mem *spimem)
>>>>>>>    	 * checking what's really supported using spi_mem_supports_op().
>>>>>>>    	 */
>>>>>>>    	const struct spi_nor_hwcaps hwcaps = { .mask = SNOR_HWCAPS_ALL };
>>>>>>> +	struct spi_mem_op op;
>>>>>>>    	char *flash_name;
>>>>>>>    	int ret;
>>>>>>> @@ -3709,8 +3710,15 @@ static int spi_nor_probe(struct spi_mem *spimem)
>>>>>>>    	if (ret)
>>>>>>>    		return ret;
>>>>>>> -	return mtd_device_register(&nor->mtd, data ? data->parts : NULL,
>>>>>>> -				   data ? data->nr_parts : 0);
>>>>>>> +	ret = mtd_device_register(&nor->mtd, data ? data->parts : NULL,
>>>>>>> +				  data ? data->nr_parts : 0);
>>>>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>>>>> +		return ret;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +	op = spi_nor_spimem_get_read_op(nor);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Isn't this too specific? I really don't know much about spi-nors, but I
>>>>>> find odd to have this op being created here, why not moving this into
>>>>>> the _do_calibration() helper?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the naming confused you but this is a function in the SPI NOR
>>>>> core, not in SPI MEM. SPI NOR supports both SPI MEM based controllers
>>>>> and "legacy" controllers, so the convention is to add the "spimem"
>>>>> prefix before SPI MEM specific functions. So I don't get the comment
>>>>> about it being too specific. It is too specific to what?
>>>>
>>>> Mmh right, it's fine then.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And how can spi_mem_do_calibration() know what op the flash uses to read
>>>>> data? SPI NOR or SPI NAND would know it, but not SPI MEM. That is why we
>>>>> pass in that information to spi_mem_do_calibration().
>>>>
>>>> But here the op is "spi-nor wide", I would have expected a
>>>> per-device op. But that is not a big deal, that is something that can
>>>> also be updated later if needed I guess.
>>>
>>> It is per-device. The op is generated using nor->read_opcode,
>>> nor->addr_width, nor->read_dummy, etc. So if you have 2 NOR flashes on
>>> your system with different opcodes, it would work for both.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> One last question, is there something that mtd_device_register() does
>>>> that is really needed for the calibration to work? Otherwise I would
>>>> rather prefer to have that calibration happening before the user gets
>>>> access to the device.
>>
>> Which would mean calling it right after :
>>
>> 	ret = spi_nor_create_read_dirmap(nor);
>> 	if (ret)
>> 		return ret;
>>
>> 	ret = spi_nor_create_write_dirmap(nor);
>> 	if (ret)
>> 		return ret;
>>
>>> The calibration works by reading a known pattern that is already written
>>> to the flash again and again and seeing what delays work and what don't.
>>> For that to happen, the controller driver needs to know where the
>>> pattern is stored.
>>
>> Why don't you simply choose some random place, first 16KB for instance,
>> and check that the data is random enough ? If not, declare calibration
>> not possible and choose a default safe setting which is anyhow a
>> requirement for calibration. Retry at reboot as data might have changed.
> 
> I did not come up with the pattern myself. But from what I can
> understand, the pattern is not random at all, but is carefully chosen to
> target certain ways a read can fail on the controller. So a random piece
> of data won't work as well as this carefully designed pattern.

True. I don't exactly remember how your proposal worked from the
driver side but I imagine having a specific DT property to locate
that pattern in the setup handler and to use it later on is not
too complex.

>>> This series does that by looking at the MTD
>>> partitions. For that to happen, we need to create those partitions
>>> first, which happens after mtd_device_register().
>>
>> hmm, that might work for some boards. This is not at all the case for
>> the BMC boards. Vendors can put any kind of flash model and/or layout
>> and the driver needs to be more generic.
> 
> Yes, vendors can choose any layout, but one partition on that layout
> would be your calibration pattern. I think you can use a different
> compatible for that partition. 

OK. and that it would become more generic then.

> I have not thought this through yet though.

If a partition is required, that's a dependency on mtdpart.

It could be done from spi_nor_probe() after mtd_device_register() with
some spimem handler using the 'struct mtd_partition' for the {size,offset}
parameters.

>>
>>> But I am planning to use device tree to get that information now so this
>>> should no longer be needed and we can do calibration before registering
>>> the device with MTD.
>>
>> Perfect, we can move the calibration hook in spi_nor_create_read_dirmap()
>> then, or in devm_spi_mem_dirmap_create(), which would make more sense IMHO.
> 
> Sorry, I still don't get why you want to tie dirmap and calibration
> together. Just let them be independent and let flash drivers take care
> of when to call what. SPI MEM should not care.

I know you would prefer a specific handler and that can still be done.

Thanks,

C.