From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3B6C43461 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBC8208C7 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 08:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727028AbgIGIBl (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 04:01:41 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:65454 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726771AbgIGIBi (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 04:01:38 -0400 IronPort-SDR: fnaCPQVv+YKBXF+l5yS4XVXv2XZdJ10gVdjnRxeGoKz33AHISbLx4ly6HH/wbQQbcenIAk/DH/ bpHXwy1SLuCQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9736"; a="176024230" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,401,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="176024230" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Sep 2020 01:01:37 -0700 IronPort-SDR: ljQt7u3FmYLG98tXC62bgoQQvyXiqrOPvVvS1sSB8R5UDFgLcVDUJ9lmNdWd6fY3JhXlWyqcIJ QoibD0AnhCVg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,401,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="479555941" Received: from yjin15-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.5.239]) ([10.238.5.239]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Sep 2020 01:01:34 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list From: "Jin, Yao" To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ian Rogers , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , LKML , Andi Kleen , kan.liang@intel.com, "Jin, Yao" References: <20200603021818.27028-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <911b4132-d1a1-f3c4-a2ed-2fcfe9a28fc6@linux.intel.com> <20200616193856.GC6393@kernel.org> <681a333b-e4dc-9481-715e-a65a34e10f83@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <82271c45-4a7d-d892-eccd-ed042b86a333@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:01:30 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <681a333b-e4dc-9481-715e-a65a34e10f83@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnaldo, On 7/17/2020 2:06 PM, Jin, Yao wrote: > Hi, > > On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: >>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao wrote: >>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset? >>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote: >>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and >>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21. >> >>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX >>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch. >> >>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree? >>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core >>>> I tried using git am but get: >>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@ >>>> error: could not build fake ancestor >>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ian >>>> >>> >>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch. >>> >>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right? >> >> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more >> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly >> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge >> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to >> rebase it like before. >> >> - Arnaldo >> > > Can this event update be accepted? > > Thanks > Jin Yao Can this event list update be accepted? Thanks Jin Yao