From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753805AbeERIhv (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 04:37:51 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:12855 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753796AbeERIhq (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 04:37:46 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,413,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="229608426" Message-ID: <822d5f47cad46ca308d511f7f24cdbc5f4af38b9.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [BUG] i2c-hid: ELAN Touchpad does not work on ASUS X580GD From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hans de Goede , Jarkko Nikula , Chris Chiu Cc: Daniel Drake , Jian-Hong Pan , Jiri Kosina , Benjamin Tissoires , Jani Nikula , Dmitry Torokhov , Adrian Salido , Jason Gerecke , linux-input , Mika Westerberg , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , Linux Upstreaming Team Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 11:37:41 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <7728da79-8a7a-b87d-d09c-b36978b3032e@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 09:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Could it be the i2c input clock definition in drivers/mfd/intel-lpss- > pci.c > is also wrong for Apollo Lake (N3450) ? There are lots of people > having > various issues with i2c attached touchpads on Apollo Lake devices, > this bug: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1728244 > > Is sort of a collection bug for these. Various models laptops, lots of > reporters. Note not sure thie is an i2c-designware issue, but it would > be good to double check the input clock on Apollo Lake. > > I've checked the datasheet and the datasheet mentions 133MHz as > "serial input clk" in the lpio_bxt_regs Registers Summary, which is > also part of the LPSS, no clk is mentioned in the "Summary of > DW_apb_i2c_mem_map_DW_apb_i2c_addr_block1 Registers". The internal datasheet we have access to mentioned in this case for Broxton and Cannonlake together. So, your assumption might be quite close to the truth and the issue is inherited from Broxton. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy