From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zlib double-free bug
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 07:26:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8274.1016781980@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C9A758D.103@acm.org>
minyard@acm.org said:
> > 2.4.19ac has the shared zlib already. The zlib sharing stuff wasnt a
> > 2.5 patch backported - its a 2.4 fix that went forward
> Since I did the original shared zlib patch and I did it to 2.5, either
> we have two patches floating around or you are incorrect. If we have
> two patches, we need to resolve the situation.
The patch that's now in the -ac tree is a backport of the 2.5 code, after we
actually made the 2.5 code _work_, that is.
Alan's right that there was at least _some_ work on a shared zlib in 2.4,
though.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-22 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-18 10:57 [PATCH] zlib double-free bug Paul Mackerras
2002-03-18 14:49 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-03-18 15:15 ` Tom Rini
2002-03-18 16:36 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-18 22:09 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-19 10:45 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-19 13:53 ` David Woodhouse
2002-03-19 18:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-19 19:14 ` Dave Jones
2002-03-19 19:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-19 19:50 ` Dave Jones
2002-03-19 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-19 20:09 ` Dave Jones
2002-03-19 20:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-03-20 9:45 ` Helge Hafting
2002-03-20 14:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-03-21 20:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-21 21:03 ` Tom Rini
2002-03-21 21:21 ` Tom Rini
2002-03-21 22:13 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-22 0:06 ` Corey Minyard
2002-03-22 7:26 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2002-03-20 15:59 ` Martin Hermanowski
2002-03-20 16:17 ` Tom Rini
2002-03-19 5:01 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8274.1016781980@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).