Hi Thomas, 

And thanks a lot for the review!

On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 09:21 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, May 19 2021 at 20:23, Stefano De Venuto wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > index 05eca131eaf2..c77d4866e239 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > @@ -3707,6 +3705,8 @@ static noinstr void
> > svm_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  
> >         kvm_guest_enter_irqoff();
> >  
> > +       trace_kvm_entry(vcpu);
> 
> No. This violates the noinstr rules and will make objtool complain on
> a
> full validation run.
> 
Ok, I see, sorry for not noticing it.

Well, in this specific case --considering others' reviews-- it seems
that the tracepoints will be moved to somewhere else anyway, but we'll
make sure to run all the proper validation steps next time.

Thanks again and Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)