From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932569AbeB1SWR (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:22:17 -0500 Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com ([212.103.203.10]:40698 "EHLO mail.micronovasrl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932126AbeB1SWQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:22:16 -0500 Authentication-Results: mail.micronovasrl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=micronovasrl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: init dclk_min_div & dclk_max_div inside encoder init functions From: Giulio Benetti To: Maxime Ripard Cc: David Airlie , Chen-Yu Tsai , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1519822318-3974-1-git-send-email-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <20180228155559.lqm22dzeiptrwyxe@flea> Message-ID: <83d1a6d8-0816-9f75-34f6-4b93e84393e4@micronovasrl.com> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:22:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: it Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Il 28/02/2018 17:34, Giulio Benetti ha scritto: > Hi, > > Il 28/02/2018 16:55, Maxime Ripard ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:51:58PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: >>> sun4i_dclk_round_rate is called before sun4i_tcon_mode_set, >>> so it finds dclk_min_div and dclk_max_div set to 0 and fails >>> adding crtc. >>> >>> Move dclk_min_div and dclk_max_div to encoders init functions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti >> >> I sent a similar patch there: >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-February/166666.html >> > > I've missed that. > And where you put it is better, since it's called every time set_mode is > called. > > On lvds instead I don't see anything about this, > it should have the same potential problem. > Also I can't understand why it has been set min=7 and max=7 on lvds. > With those values I would obtain 77Mhz only. > And I can't find values on datasheet for minimum and maximum. Submitted patchset for that. > >> >> I guess eventually, we'll want to remove the usage of the clock >> framework entirely, but it's not really the scope of a fix. > > Where would you handle dclk instead of tcon? Don't mind. -- Giulio Benetti CTO MICRONOVA SRL Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD) Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346 Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285 Capitale Sociale € 26.000 i.v. Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285 Numero R.E.A. 258642 > > Thanks >