From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263006AbVFWIIx (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:08:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262576AbVFWIEx (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:04:53 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.199]:22307 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262500AbVFWG0i convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:26:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZsubFC+G7CDRoZmmI1ORvVWIYrmh3suAD/ULGEHOrIgCvGV1AyoteaRHBvIRiNHfT+1s9+5c215GelrKjVjc02JiUBEljsXFR/dCMedAZnFmKfgNBLhBj8+vy67Dc3R+8xBd6QmzypCRbMoUF+CnGk0fpM0pbVCctNlQL9ajMq4= Message-ID: <84144f0205062223266ab40243@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:26:37 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg Reply-To: Pekka Enberg To: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Cc: Jeff Garzik , David Masover , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List , Pekka Enberg In-Reply-To: <42BA4F7E.6000402@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> <42B831B4.9020603@pobox.com> <42B87318.80607@namesys.com> <20050621202448.GB30182@infradead.org> <42B8B9EE.7020002@namesys.com> <42B8BB5E.8090008@pobox.com> <42B8E834.5030809@slaphack.com> <42B8F4BC.5060100@pobox.com> <42BA4F7E.6000402@namesys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Hans, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > We have to maintain said ugly code for decades. On 6/23/05, Hans Reiser wrote: > No you don't, I do. Lots of people work on the kernel. If you wish to keep reiser4 maintenance to yourself, you probably need to keep it as a separate patch. Please consider submitting the non-controversial bits for merging first and then continue with the rest. It does not make a lot of sense reviewing the current patchkit as many parts of it won't be merged as is (e.g. the plugin stuff). Pekka