From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] tracing: consolidate documents
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:16:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020904082216hfb5f5ene87781f9aaf7e76c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090409041319.GE20692@elte.hu>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> Li Zefan wrote:
>> > Move tracepoints.txt, ftrace.txt and mmiotrace.txt to the new
>> > directory trace/
>> >
>>
>> Should we also move kmemtrace.txt to trace/, or leave it in vm/?
>
> Eduard, Pekka, any preferences?
>
> Are symbolic links in Documentation/ frowned upon? I think it would
> be best to have the file in both places:
>
> We do want to direct people interested in Documentation/vm/ to
> kmemtrace ... and we do want to let people who are interested in
> Documentation/trace/ that there's kmemtrace.
>
> Tracing and instrumentation is generally a multi-subsystem thing.
I'm not sure a symbolic link is necessary. Just put it under trace/.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-09 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 3:40 [PATCH] tracing: consolidate documents Li Zefan
2009-04-09 3:52 ` [PATCH][RESEND] " Li Zefan
2009-04-09 3:59 ` Li Zefan
2009-04-09 4:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-09 5:16 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-04-09 5:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-09 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-04-09 4:37 ` [tip:tracing/urgent] " Li Zefan
2009-04-09 7:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-09 5:30 ` Li Zefan
2009-04-09 15:53 ` Pekka Paalanen
2009-04-09 16:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-04-10 0:36 ` Li Zefan
2009-04-10 13:04 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020904082216hfb5f5ene87781f9aaf7e76c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pq@iki.fi \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).