linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: brookxu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>
To: paolo.valente@linaro.org, axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] bfq: convert the type of bfq_group.bfqd to bfq_data*
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:08:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <856a594d70b9a43b911285ff192d892d664001b0.1615527324.git.brookxu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1615517202.git.brookxu@tencent.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1615527324.git.brookxu@tencent.com>

From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>

Setting bfq_group.bfqd to void* type does not seem to make much sense.
This will cause unnecessary type conversion. Perhaps it would be better
to change it to bfq_data* type.

Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
---
 block/bfq-cgroup.c  | 2 +-
 block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 +-
 block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
index a5f544acaa61..50d06c760194 100644
--- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void bfqg_stats_update_io_add(struct bfq_group *bfqg, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
 {
 	blkg_rwstat_add(&bfqg->stats.queued, op, 1);
 	bfqg_stats_end_empty_time(&bfqg->stats);
-	if (!(bfqq == ((struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd)->in_service_queue))
+	if (!(bfqq == bfqg->bfqd->in_service_queue))
 		bfqg_stats_set_start_group_wait_time(bfqg, bfqq_group(bfqq));
 }
 
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index a6f98e9e14b5..28d85903cf66 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ struct bfq_group {
 	struct bfq_entity entity;
 	struct bfq_sched_data sched_data;
 
-	void *bfqd;
+	struct bfq_data *bfqd;
 
 	struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_BE_NR];
 	struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq;
diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
index 5ff0028920a2..276f225f9c6e 100644
--- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
+++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static void bfq_active_insert(struct bfq_service_tree *st,
 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
 	sd = entity->sched_data;
 	bfqg = container_of(sd, struct bfq_group, sched_data);
-	bfqd = (struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd;
+	bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;
 #endif
 	if (bfqq)
 		list_add(&bfqq->bfqq_list, &bfqq->bfqd->active_list);
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static void bfq_active_extract(struct bfq_service_tree *st,
 #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
 	sd = entity->sched_data;
 	bfqg = container_of(sd, struct bfq_group, sched_data);
-	bfqd = (struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd;
+	bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;
 #endif
 	if (bfqq)
 		list_del(&bfqq->bfqq_list);
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
 		else {
 			sd = entity->my_sched_data;
 			bfqg = container_of(sd, struct bfq_group, sched_data);
-			bfqd = (struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd;
+			bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;
 		}
 #endif
 
-- 
2.30.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-12 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-12 11:08 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] bfq: introduce bfq.ioprio for cgroup brookxu
     [not found] ` <cover.1615527324.git.brookxu@tencent.com>
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` brookxu [this message]
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] bfq: introduce bfq.ioprio for cgroup brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] bfq: limit the IO depth of idle_class to 1 brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] bfq: keep the minimun bandwidth for be_class brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] bfq: expire other class if CLASS_RT is waiting brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] bfq: optimse IO injection for CLASS_RT brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] bfq: disallow idle if CLASS_RT waiting for service brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] bfq: disallow merge CLASS_RT with other class brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] bfq: remove unnecessary initialization logic brookxu
2021-03-12 11:08   ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] bfq: optimize the calculation of bfq_weight_to_ioprio() brookxu
2021-03-21 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] bfq: introduce bfq.ioprio for cgroup Paolo Valente
2021-03-22  5:44   ` brookxu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=856a594d70b9a43b911285ff192d892d664001b0.1615527324.git.brookxu@tencent.com \
    --to=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).