From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name,
bottura.nicola95@gmail.com, srivatsa@csail.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 0/7] boost throughput with synced I/O, reduce latency and fix a bandwidth bug
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:35:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8575fbfc-79b3-c58d-0440-9b7736bdee6a@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625051249.39265-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
On 6/24/19 11:12 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> [SAME AS V1, APART FROM SRIVATSA ADDED AS REPORTER]
>
> Hi Jens,
> this series, based against for-5.3/block, contains:
> 1) The improvements to recover the throughput loss reported by
> Srivatsa [1] (first five patches)
> 2) A preemption improvement to reduce I/O latency
> 3) A fix of a subtle bug causing loss of control over I/O bandwidths
Applied for 5.3, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 5:12 [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 0/7] boost throughput with synced I/O, reduce latency and fix a bandwidth bug Paolo Valente
2019-06-25 5:12 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 1/7] block, bfq: reset inject limit when think-time state changes Paolo Valente
2019-06-25 5:12 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 2/7] block, bfq: fix rq_in_driver check in bfq_update_inject_limit Paolo Valente
2019-06-25 5:12 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 3/7] block, bfq: update base request service times when possible Paolo Valente
2019-06-25 5:12 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 4/7] block, bfq: bring forward seek&think time update Paolo Valente
2019-06-25 5:12 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 5/7] block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject their I/O Paolo Valente
2019-07-27 17:38 ` Doug Anderson
2019-06-25 5:12 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 6/7] block, bfq: preempt lower-weight or lower-priority queues Paolo Valente
2019-06-25 5:12 ` [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 7/7] block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O plugging Paolo Valente
2019-06-25 15:35 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8575fbfc-79b3-c58d-0440-9b7736bdee6a@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com \
--cc=bottura.nicola95@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).