From: Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Issue with max_threads (and other resources) and highmem
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:46:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85870000.1003869979@baldur> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <k28ze2drfg.fsf@zero.aec.at>
In-Reply-To: <72940000.1003868385@baldur> <k28ze2drfg.fsf@zero.aec.at>
--On Tuesday, October 23, 2001 22:36:51 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:
> I would just limit it to a reasonable max value; e.g. 10000
> if someone needs more than 10000 threads/processes he/she can set sysctls
> manually. The current scheduler would choke anyways if only a small
> fraction of 10000 threads are runnable.
Yes, that would solve the max_threads problem. It should be fairly simple
to pick a reasonable number.
But my question is also about the other subsystems called from
start_kernel() that take memory size as an argument. This includes
vfs_caches_init() which in turn calls dcache_init(), and buffer_init() and
page_cache_init(). I haven't dug down to the bottom of all these
functions, but I'm guessing they really want to base their calculations on
available normal memory and not high memory.
Dave McCracken
======================================================================
Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059
dmccr@us.ibm.com T/L 678-3059
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-23 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-23 20:19 Issue with max_threads (and other resources) and highmem Dave McCracken
2001-10-23 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2001-10-23 20:46 ` Dave McCracken [this message]
2001-10-23 20:52 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-23 21:05 ` Dave McCracken
2001-10-23 21:59 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-23 23:30 Dan Kegel
2001-10-23 23:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-24 0:00 ` Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85870000.1003869979@baldur \
--to=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).