From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
metze@samba.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
cyphar@cyphar.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:30:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <859019.1583159423@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7z7ngd4.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Regarding open flags, I think the key point for future APIs is to avoid
> using the set of flags for both control of the operation itself
> (O_NOFOLLOW/AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, O_NOCTTY) and properaties of the
> resulting descriptor (O_RDWR, O_SYNC). I expect that doing that would
> help code that has to re-create an equivalent descriptor. The operation
> flags are largely irrelevant to that if you can get the descriptor by
> other means.
It would also be nice to sort out the problem with O_CLOEXEC. That can have a
different value, depending on the arch - so it excludes at least three bits
from the O_* flag set.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 14:53 Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls? David Howells
2020-02-28 15:24 ` Christian Brauner
2020-02-29 15:26 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-02-29 15:54 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-03-01 16:46 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-01 16:38 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 11:30 ` Florian Weimer
2020-03-02 11:52 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 12:05 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 15:10 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 15:36 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-03-02 16:31 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 12:09 ` Florian Weimer
2020-03-02 12:19 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 12:35 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 12:42 ` Florian Weimer
2020-03-02 12:55 ` Christian Brauner
[not found] ` <20200305141154.e246swv62rnctite@yavin>
2020-03-05 15:23 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-05 14:33 ` David Howells
2020-03-05 14:38 ` Florian Weimer
2020-03-05 14:43 ` David Howells
2020-03-02 14:27 ` David Howells
2020-03-02 14:35 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 14:50 ` David Howells
2020-03-02 15:05 ` Christian Brauner
2020-03-02 15:24 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-03-02 16:37 ` David Howells
2020-03-06 14:48 ` David Howells
2020-03-02 15:10 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-03-02 15:23 ` David Howells
2020-03-02 14:30 ` David Howells [this message]
2020-03-02 15:04 ` Aleksa Sarai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=859019.1583159423@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=metze@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).