From: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: dwapb: mask/unmask IRQ when disable/enable it
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 21:04:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8592c7f0-a9e9-f48c-e9e4-0e24e22b3f57@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdawv2NUahn2gniH=29T6qqqFYSa53giC01PS1wq91+Ksg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2020/12/6 23:02, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:15 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, that sounds like a problem, but the explanation is a bit unclear
>> to me. AFAICS you are saying that the only callbacks which are
>> called during the IRQ request/release are the irq_enable(), right? If
>> so then the only reason why we haven't got a problem reported due to
>> that so far is that the IRQs actually unmasked by default.
> What we usually do in cases like that (and I have discussed this
> with tglx in the past I think) is to simply mask off all IRQs in probe().
> Then they will be unmasked when requested by drivers.
Yes, I agree. but in this case I mean that they will not unmasked when
drivers request IRQ.
Drivers request IRQ will only call irq_enable(), so if we mask all IRQ
in gpio-dwab.'s probe(),
no one will unmask the IRQ for drivers.
Thanks
Jiaxing
>
> See e.g. gpio-pl061 that has this line in probe():
> writeb(0, pl061->base + GPIOIE); /* disable irqs */
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 9:36 [PATCH v1] gpio: dwapb: mask/unmask IRQ when disable/enable it Luo Jiaxing
2020-11-30 11:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 8:59 ` luojiaxing
2020-12-05 22:15 ` Serge Semin
2020-12-06 15:02 ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-06 18:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-07 13:10 ` luojiaxing
2021-01-06 10:24 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
[not found] ` <CAHp75VcFo2hc1kjP9jLxmCdN79rD2R4vCw2P8UssbWe2v4zwcw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-07 12:20 ` Serge Semin
2020-12-07 13:04 ` luojiaxing [this message]
2020-12-07 12:44 ` luojiaxing
2020-12-05 21:58 ` Linus Walleij
2023-12-15 8:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-12-15 10:24 ` Serge Semin
2023-12-15 10:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-12-15 12:57 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8592c7f0-a9e9-f48c-e9e4-0e24e22b3f57@huawei.com \
--to=luojiaxing@huawei.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).