linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>,
	"rui.zhang@intel.com" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "edubezval@gmail.com" <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:29:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86739c2a-3027-0ac0-e4d1-8257f00effc6@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR0401MB221381AD65417D17AAD7B16DF3F60@DB5PR0401MB2213.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 24/10/2018 04:48, Andy Tang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Sent: 2018年10月16日 19:21
>> To: Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>; rui.zhang@intel.com
>> Cc: edubezval@gmail.com; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>>
>>>>>> The current code is reading the DT in order to get the sensor id
>>>>>> and initialize it. IOW, the DT gives the sensors to use.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO, it would be more self contained if the driver initializes all
>>>>>> the sensors without taking care of the DT and let the of- code to
>>>>>> do the binding when the thermal zone, no ?
>>>>> [Andy] could you please explain more about this way? I am not sure
>>>>> how
>>>> to implement it.
>>>>> But one thing is for sure: we must get the sensor IDs explicitly so
>>>>> that we can enable them by the following command:
>> tmu_write(qdata,
>>>>> sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &qdata->regs->tmr);
>>>>
>>>> What I meant is about code separation between the driver itself and
>>>> the of-thermal code.
>>>>
>>>> The code above re-inspect the DT to find out the sensor ids in order
>>>> to enable them and somehow this is not wrong but breaks the self
>>>> encapsulation of the driver. I was suggesting if it isn't possible to
>>>> enable all the sensors without taking care of digging into the DT.
>>>
>>> [Andy] I don't want to re-parse the DT here too. But I have to.
>>> This driver will be used by all our SOCs with different sensor IDs and
>> number.
>>> For example: there are 2 sensors on ls1088a platform with ID 0 and 1.
>>> While on ls1043a there are 6 sensors with ID 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
>>> If we don't scan the DT we would not know how many sensors it is and
>>> what are the sensor's IDs, unless we hardcode it in driver.
>>
>> Yes, you are not the only one in this situation IMO and the drivers
>> supporting multiple sensors are increasing, so this will repeat again and
>> again.
>>
>> That could be hardcoded in the driver by using the compatible string but it
>> will be nicer if we can fix that in the DT.
>>
>> [Cc'ing Rob]
>>
>> What is missing is a description of the sensors id in the temperature
>> device node. We have the <thermal-sensor-cells> with 0 or 1 telling if
>> there is one or several sensors but we can't specify which sensor ids we
>> have. The only alternative is to parse the thermal zones to found out which
>> sensors are in use and use them to initialize the driver, an approach which
>> breaks the self-encapsulation: the of-thermal framework is the one in
>> charge of doing the link between the thermal zone and a sensor id.
>>
>> Is it acceptable to add the list of the sensors id in the temp device node, so
>> the driver can initialize these sensors without parsing the thermal zone in
>> the DT ?
>>
> Have you got any conclusion yet?
> When can I send the next version of this patch?


Let's give an opportunity to Rob to answer.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-24  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-27  2:42 andy.tang
2018-10-11  8:07 ` Andy Tang
2018-10-11  8:56   ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-13 20:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-15  1:41   ` Andy Tang
2018-10-15  8:55     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-16  3:01       ` Andy Tang
2018-10-16 11:20         ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-24  2:48           ` Andy Tang
2018-10-24  8:29             ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2018-10-24 12:52           ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86739c2a-3027-0ac0-e4d1-8257f00effc6@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=andy.tang@nxp.com \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).