From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16409C433E4 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E7D206EB for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="4xeToqQJ"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="JuIC3Wa2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726739AbgHYVkN (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:40:13 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:52654 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726222AbgHYVkN (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:40:13 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1598391611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Xevxgk/koQBpWDveP6OSc84vgcr5kfA4Zdl3bp5EVM4=; b=4xeToqQJtFdDP336L/z/rJTPtiaEMQCwoWm7ZO3Dg80xwJI6LJbbyPem9IgDDH4c55kFW8 efqvvncv7tcn3qZRe1acTT+kpdjKgMt9wBNwOWKpIu8I/uajoL15iwyI1xdSxrTpkklftN qSOF96Uua9BwCriI1UaH4colhyY+dU/jTNfAqa0OFWsv2NiYjXrj2a+s3Ori4UXHG1ddJa SA25EuwSuC9jCrd07R3Jsye+YPfQwEl1Ep3+ek2m/tcneuMb2osfUQOvMB9hVnwV5yHYK2 m18kpfK5PCTA749jQbnkT3Om2+aFbVSlYN71Sn1ixrGPB3rBhJD9Y7h2fYYcZQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1598391611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Xevxgk/koQBpWDveP6OSc84vgcr5kfA4Zdl3bp5EVM4=; b=JuIC3Wa21psedQKJydMn/nuPaxSXUZxPFQxtgBHwdGz1Ag7Nv0IARkCrU78WZB/vmrNKK/ V7gDLpNFS4jDbzDw== To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang , Jon Derrick , Lu Baolu , Wei Liu , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Stephen Hemminger , Steve Wahl , Dimitri Sivanich , Russ Anderson , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Stefano Stabellini , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Megha Dey , Jason Gunthorpe , Dave Jiang , Alex Williamson , Jacob Pan , Baolu Lu , Kevin Tian , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [patch RFC 30/38] PCI/MSI: Allow to disable arch fallbacks In-Reply-To: <20200825213501.GA1931388@bjorn-Precision-5520> References: <20200825213501.GA1931388@bjorn-Precision-5520> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 23:40:10 +0200 Message-ID: <871rjuxv45.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 25 2020 at 16:35, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:28:30PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> Or did you just mean that those architectures should select >> CONFIG_I_WANT_THE CRUFT instead of opting out on the fully irq domain >> based ones? > > Yes, that was my real question -- can we confine the cruft in the > crufty arches? If not, no big deal. Should be doable. Let me try. Thanks, tglx