From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264272AbTLCRqN (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:46:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264284AbTLCRqN (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:46:13 -0500 Received: from k1.dinoex.de ([80.237.200.138]:39917 "EHLO k1.dinoex.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264272AbTLCRqJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:46:09 -0500 To: Ian Hastie CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot X-Face: ""xJff%{>hr-{:QXl"Xk2O@@(+F]e{"%EYQiW@mUuvEsL>=mx96j12qW[%m;|:B^n{J8k?Mz[K1_+H;$v,nYx^1o_=4M,L+]FIU~[[`-w~~xsy-BX,?tAF_.8u&0y*@aCv;a}Y'{w@#*@iwAl?oZpvvv X-Message-Flag: This space is intentionally left blank X-Noad: Please don't send me ad's by mail. I'm bored by this type of mail. X-Note: sending SPAM is a violation of both german and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster. X-GPG: 1024D/77D4FC9B 2000-08-12 Jochen Hein (28 Jun 1967, Kassel, Germany) Key fingerprint = F5C5 1C20 1DFC DEC3 3107 54A4 2332 ADFC 77D4 FC9B X-BND-Spook: RAF Taliban BND BKA Bombe Waffen Terror AES GPG References: <87ptf8bpnd.fsf@echidna.jochen.org> <200312020300.13067.ianh@iahastie.local.net> <878ylvjqpv.fsf@echidna.jochen.org> <200312031710.43786.ianh@iahastie.local.net> From: Jochen Hein X-No-Archive: yes Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:37:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200312031710.43786.ianh@iahastie.local.net> (Ian Hastie's message of "Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:10:42 +0000") Message-ID: <871xrl4xbs.fsf@echidna.jochen.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian Hastie writes: > No faster machine to compile on? An Mini-ITX with 550MHz isn't that much faster (but very quiet). > Still think this isn't a kernel problem anyway. That's my current guess too. >> For now the system seems to be fine, even when starting from Win2k via >> BIOS reboot. Hmpf. > > Annoying. Can you think of anything you might have done with Windows 2000, eg > programme run or device used, that you haven't done when testing? I won't have time this week, maybe next. What concerns my is that -test11 locks the machine hard after an hour or so (nmi-watchdog doesn't say anything), but 2.4 seems to be stable. Since I need a stable machine next week I'll stay with 2.4 for now and come back later. Jochen -- #include <~/.signature>: permission denied