* [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
@ 2003-12-01 14:04 Jochen Hein
2003-12-01 19:33 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-12-02 3:00 ` Ian Hastie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jochen Hein @ 2003-12-01 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I'm running 2.6.0-test11 on an older Thinkpad 390E,
When booting into 2.6.0-test11 after running Windows2000 I get:
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Initializing CPU#0
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: PID hash table entries: 1024 (order 10: 8192 bytes)
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Detected 298.602 MHz processor.
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Memory: 190848k/196544k available (2008k kernel code, 5060k reserved, 762k data, 148k init, 0k
highmem)
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 587.77 BogoMIPS
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Capability LSM initialized
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Intel machine check architecture supported.
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: Intel Mobile Pentium II stepping 0a
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
When booting cold the boot messages are:
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Initializing CPU#0
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: PID hash table entries: 1024 (order 10: 8192 bytes)
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Detected 298.598 MHz processor.
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Memory: 190848k/196544k available (2008k kernel code, 5060k reserved, 762k data, 148k init, 0k
highmem)
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 587.77 BogoMIPS
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Capability LSM initialized
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: L2 cache: 256K
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Intel machine check architecture supported.
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: Intel Mobile Pentium II stepping 0a
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
/proc/cpuinfo contains (after warm boot):
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : Mobile Pentium II
stepping : 10
cpu MHz : 298.598
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr
bogomips : 587.77
Is there any way to find out, why the second level cache isn't
detected after a warm boot?
Jochen
--
#include <~/.signature>: permission denied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-01 14:04 [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot Jochen Hein
@ 2003-12-01 19:33 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-12-02 13:16 ` Jochen Hein
2003-12-02 3:00 ` Ian Hastie
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2003-12-01 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jochen Hein; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 15:04:22 +0100 Jochen Hein <jochen@jochen.org> wrote:
|
| I'm running 2.6.0-test11 on an older Thinkpad 390E,
| When booting into 2.6.0-test11 after running Windows2000 I get:
|
...
| Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
| Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
| Dec 1 14:51:56 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
...
|
| When booting cold the boot messages are:
|
...
| Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
| Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
| Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
| Dec 1 14:54:57 gswi1164 kernel: CPU: L2 cache: 256K
Can you apply this patch so that we can see what cache/TLB descriptors
are found during the boot?
--
~Randy
description: dump cache/TLB descriptors while trying to identify them
product_versions: Linux 2.6.0-test11
diffstat:=
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -Naurp ./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c~caches ./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c
--- ./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c~caches 2003-11-26 12:43:27.000000000 -0800
+++ ./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel.c 2003-12-01 11:04:46.000000000 -0800
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static void __init init_intel(struct cpu
unsigned char des = dp[j];
unsigned char k = 0;
+ printk("CPU: searching for des = 0x%x\n", des);
/* look up this descriptor in the table */
while (cache_table[k].descriptor != 0)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-01 19:33 ` Randy.Dunlap
@ 2003-12-02 13:16 ` Jochen Hein
2003-12-02 18:14 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jochen Hein @ 2003-12-02 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: rddunlap
"Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org> writes:
> Can you apply this patch so that we can see what cache/TLB descriptors
> are found during the boot?
The last reboots (cold, warm from Linux and Win2k) all had Level2
cache enabled. I'll keep running with your patch, so we have some
traces when it happens again.
What disturbs me is that the system locked hard a view times now.
I've now restricted memory with mem=190m (has 196m installed). I'll
keep investigating.
Jochen
--
#include <~/.signature>: permission denied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-02 13:16 ` Jochen Hein
@ 2003-12-02 18:14 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 19:15 ` Jochen Hein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2003-12-02 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jochen Hein; +Cc: linux-kernel, rddunlap
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 02:16:33PM +0100, Jochen Hein wrote:
> I've now restricted memory with mem=190m (has 196m installed). I'll
> keep investigating.
What good does cutting 6MB off from use?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-02 18:14 ` Mike Fedyk
@ 2003-12-02 19:15 ` Jochen Hein
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jochen Hein @ 2003-12-02 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: mfedyk
Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 02:16:33PM +0100, Jochen Hein wrote:
>> I've now restricted memory with mem=190m (has 196m installed). I'll
>> keep investigating.
>
> What good does cutting 6MB off from use?
My old TP 600 had 96m installed, but due to BIOS-usage (mwave IIRC),
only 95m could be used for the os. This is just a shot in the blue
now, but it didn't help anway.
Jochen
--
#include <~/.signature>: permission denied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-01 14:04 [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot Jochen Hein
2003-12-01 19:33 ` Randy.Dunlap
@ 2003-12-02 3:00 ` Ian Hastie
2003-12-02 13:26 ` Jochen Hein
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ian Hastie @ 2003-12-02 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Monday 01 Dec 2003 14:04, Jochen Hein wrote:
> I'm running 2.6.0-test11 on an older Thinkpad 390E,
> When booting into 2.6.0-test11 after running Windows2000 I get:
Do any of the previous test releases show this problem? How are you booting
Linux? Full warm boot via the BIOS or some loadlin kind of boot? If it's
via the BIOS then does that show the L2 cache as being present?
> When booting cold the boot messages are:
Presumably from switch on.
> /proc/cpuinfo contains (after warm boot):
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 6
> model name : Mobile Pentium II
> stepping : 10
> cpu MHz : 298.598
> cache size : 256 KB
And shows as 0 after warm boot?
> fdiv_bug : no
> hlt_bug : no
> f00f_bug : no
> coma_bug : no
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 2
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov
> pat pse36 mmx fxsr bogomips : 587.77
>
> Is there any way to find out, why the second level cache isn't
> detected after a warm boot?
My immediate thought was a BIOS problem. IBM's web site doesn't say any BIOS
updates fix L2 cache related problems, but then it doesn't seem to use
technical descriptions like that. It says the latest BIOS is 1.55 - R01_C9.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&uid=psg1MIGR-4F3VKB&loc=en_US
Or maybe it's possible that something in MS Windows 2000 is turning off the L2
cache and it isn't getting reactivated by the warm boot? What happens when
you do a cold boot to Linux then reboot from there?
--
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-02 3:00 ` Ian Hastie
@ 2003-12-02 13:26 ` Jochen Hein
2003-12-03 17:10 ` Ian Hastie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jochen Hein @ 2003-12-02 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: ianh
Ian Hastie <ianh@iahastie.clara.net> writes:
> On Monday 01 Dec 2003 14:04, Jochen Hein wrote:
>> I'm running 2.6.0-test11 on an older Thinkpad 390E,
>> When booting into 2.6.0-test11 after running Windows2000 I get:
>
> Do any of the previous test releases show this problem?
-test11 is the first release running on that machine. My older TP600
destroyed its WIndows 95 so I got a replacement. Compiling a kernel
takes an hour or two, so it is not much fun trying different kernels.
> How are you booting
> Linux? Full warm boot via the BIOS or some loadlin kind of boot?
via BIOS, lilo in MBR
> If it's
> via the BIOS then does that show the L2 cache as being present?
The BIOS doesn't tell anything, the setup doesn't have a "cache
enable" or "turbo" entry.
>> When booting cold the boot messages are:
>
> Presumably from switch on.
Yes.
>> /proc/cpuinfo contains (after warm boot):
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> cpu family : 6
>> model : 6
>> model name : Mobile Pentium II
>> stepping : 10
>> cpu MHz : 298.598
>> cache size : 256 KB
>
> And shows as 0 after warm boot?
Hm, can't say for sure, because it didn't happen again.
> My immediate thought was a BIOS problem. IBM's web site doesn't say any BIOS
> updates fix L2 cache related problems, but then it doesn't seem to use
> technical descriptions like that. It says the latest BIOS is 1.55 - R01_C9.
>
> http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&uid=psg1MIGR-4F3VKB&loc=en_US
I'll see what BIOS I have - it is the latest. Thanks for the hint anyway.
> Or maybe it's possible that something in MS Windows 2000 is turning off the L2
> cache and it isn't getting reactivated by the warm boot?
Is there any way to see what Windows does here? I only found a manual
enable of the L2cache when using older processors.
> What happens when
> you do a cold boot to Linux then reboot from there?
That is fine.
For now the system seems to be fine, even when starting from Win2k via
BIOS reboot. Hmpf.
Jochen
--
#include <~/.signature>: permission denied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-02 13:26 ` Jochen Hein
@ 2003-12-03 17:10 ` Ian Hastie
2003-12-03 17:37 ` Jochen Hein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ian Hastie @ 2003-12-03 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 13:26, Jochen Hein wrote:
> Ian Hastie <ianh@iahastie.clara.net> writes:
> > On Monday 01 Dec 2003 14:04, Jochen Hein wrote:
> >> I'm running 2.6.0-test11 on an older Thinkpad 390E,
> >> When booting into 2.6.0-test11 after running Windows2000 I get:
> >
> > Do any of the previous test releases show this problem?
>
> -test11 is the first release running on that machine. My older TP600
> destroyed its WIndows 95 so I got a replacement. Compiling a kernel
> takes an hour or two, so it is not much fun trying different kernels.
No faster machine to compile on? Still think this isn't a kernel problem
anyway.
> > If it's
> > via the BIOS then does that show the L2 cache as being present?
>
> The BIOS doesn't tell anything, the setup doesn't have a "cache
> enable" or "turbo" entry.
I was just hoping it would have a configuration screen shown after POST. I
had expected that it would show any active caches. Doesn't seem so likely
now though. *8/
> > My immediate thought was a BIOS problem. IBM's web site doesn't say any
> > BIOS updates fix L2 cache related problems, but then it doesn't seem to
> > use technical descriptions like that. It says the latest BIOS is 1.55 -
> > R01_C9.
> >
> > http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0&uid=psg1MIGR-4F3VKB&loc=en_
> >US
>
> I'll see what BIOS I have - it is the latest. Thanks for the hint anyway.
OK. *8)
> > Or maybe it's possible that something in MS Windows 2000 is turning off
> > the L2 cache and it isn't getting reactivated by the warm boot?
>
> Is there any way to see what Windows does here? I only found a manual
> enable of the L2cache when using older processors.
Who knows what a Windows programme or driver might do in order to "fix" some
problem? I suppose it's possible that a programme like SiSoft Sandra might
be able to tell if the L2 cache is active or not. There is almost bound to
be some programme that can read the appropriate configuration bits.
> > What happens when
> > you do a cold boot to Linux then reboot from there?
>
> That is fine.
>
> For now the system seems to be fine, even when starting from Win2k via
> BIOS reboot. Hmpf.
Annoying. Can you think of anything you might have done with Windows 2000, eg
programme run or device used, that you haven't done when testing?
--
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot
2003-12-03 17:10 ` Ian Hastie
@ 2003-12-03 17:37 ` Jochen Hein
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jochen Hein @ 2003-12-03 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Hastie; +Cc: linux-kernel
Ian Hastie <ianh@iahastie.clara.net> writes:
> No faster machine to compile on?
An Mini-ITX with 550MHz isn't that much faster (but very quiet).
> Still think this isn't a kernel problem anyway.
That's my current guess too.
>> For now the system seems to be fine, even when starting from Win2k via
>> BIOS reboot. Hmpf.
>
> Annoying. Can you think of anything you might have done with Windows 2000, eg
> programme run or device used, that you haven't done when testing?
I won't have time this week, maybe next. What concerns my is that
-test11 locks the machine hard after an hour or so (nmi-watchdog
doesn't say anything), but 2.4 seems to be stable. Since I need a
stable machine next week I'll stay with 2.4 for now and come back
later.
Jochen
--
#include <~/.signature>: permission denied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-03 17:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-01 14:04 [2.6] Missing L2-cache after warm boot Jochen Hein
2003-12-01 19:33 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-12-02 13:16 ` Jochen Hein
2003-12-02 18:14 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 19:15 ` Jochen Hein
2003-12-02 3:00 ` Ian Hastie
2003-12-02 13:26 ` Jochen Hein
2003-12-03 17:10 ` Ian Hastie
2003-12-03 17:37 ` Jochen Hein
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).