From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: psodagud@codeaurora.org
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org, sboyd@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, saravanak@google.com,
pkondeti@codeaurora.org, Joonwoo Park <joonwoop@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] timer: make deferrable cpu unbound timers really not bound to a cpu
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:34:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736831pv0.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba1e3e84f0a77d550898222e94844ca7@codeaurora.org>
Prasad,
psodagud@codeaurora.org writes:
> On 2020-05-13 13:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> psodagud@codeaurora.org writes:
>>> It is not clear to me how to avoid #ifdef's in this case. Could you
>>> please share an example here?
>>
>> The answer is further down already:
>
> I think, you are referring stub functions. Yes. I can reduce some of the
> #ifdefs with stub functions as you mentioned and not all the cases
> right?
> I have introduced two variables timer_base_deferrable and
> deferrable_pending and I can put stub function where ever is possible.
> But it may not be appropriate to have stub function for all the
> references of these variables right? Correct me if my understanding is
> wrong.
Is this a quiz or are you expecting me to make your homework?
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-02 18:28 [PATCH v3 0/2] timer: make deferrable cpu unbound timers really not bound to a cpu Prasad Sodagudi
2020-05-02 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Prasad Sodagudi
2020-05-04 18:11 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-05 0:08 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-06 13:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-13 19:53 ` psodagud
2020-05-13 20:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-13 20:55 ` psodagud
2020-05-13 21:34 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-05-02 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched: Add a check for cpu unbound deferrable timers Prasad Sodagudi
2020-05-04 19:11 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-06 14:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736831pv0.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=joonwoop@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).