From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
agruenba@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
paul@paul-moore.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, avagin@openvz.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
luto@amacapital.net, gorcunov@openvz.org, mingo@kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] userns,pidns: Verify the userns for new pid namespaces
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 23:42:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737cqsdzq.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a86yseej.fsf@xmission.com> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2017 23:33:24 -0500")
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> writes:
>
>> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
>>>
>>> It is pointless and confusing to allow a pid namespace hierarchy and
>>> the user namespace hierarchy to get out of sync. The owner of a child
>>> pid namespace should be the owner of the parent pid namespace or
>>> a descendant of the owner of the parent pid namespace.
>>>
>>> Otherwise it is possible to construct scenarios where it is legal to
>>> do something in a parent pid namespace but in a child pid namespace.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> did you mean 'but not in a child...' above?
>
> Actually I believe I meant:
>
>>> Otherwise it is possible to construct scenarios where it is not legal
>>> to do something in a parent pid namespace but it is legal a child pid
>>> namespace.
>
> I definitely need to fix that wording thank you.
Looking at some more I mean:
Otherwise it is possible to construct scenarios where a process has a
capability in a over a parent pid namespace but does not have the
capability over a child pid namespace. Which confusingly makes
permission checks non-transitive.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-30 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-27 12:32 [PATCH v3] pid_ns: Introduce ioctl to set vector of ns_last_pid's on ns hierarhy Kirill Tkhai
2017-04-27 15:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-04-27 15:52 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-04-27 16:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-04-28 9:13 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-04-29 19:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-04-29 19:25 ` [PATCH] userns,pidns: Verify the userns for new pid namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2017-04-29 20:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2017-04-30 4:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-04-30 4:42 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2017-05-02 10:03 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-05-02 10:04 ` Kirill Tkhai
2017-05-02 20:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-05-02 9:53 ` [PATCH v3] pid_ns: Introduce ioctl to set vector of ns_last_pid's on ns hierarhy Kirill Tkhai
2017-05-02 21:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8737cqsdzq.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).