From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756363Ab1DGRI4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:08:56 -0400 Received: from na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.209]:59847 "EHLO na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756237Ab1DGRIy (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:08:54 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Paul Mundt Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Grant Likely , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms Organization: Texas Instruments, Inc. References: <1302134569-22825-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <1302134569-22825-5-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:08:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110407165654.GD8052@linux-sh.org> (Paul Mundt's message of "Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:56:54 +0900") Message-ID: <8739lu9eg6.fsf@ti.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Mundt writes: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM >> implementation. Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on >> simple clock gating can use this implementation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman > > This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that > keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be > better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol. Sounds fine to me. Thanks for the review, Kevin