From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8CFC48BD6 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A348621726 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 02:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=wdc.com header.i=@wdc.com header.b="VyopmJiJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727076AbfF0CSj (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:18:39 -0400 Received: from esa1.hgst.iphmx.com ([68.232.141.245]:33003 "EHLO esa1.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726830AbfF0CSj (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:18:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1561601918; x=1593137918; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tfwp7gFaZ6qND8kZaF7KWkT1wyf1zxCP1c9dIpITNvc=; b=VyopmJiJ2dTyiLq1F0/B5SezS3UXRMLoYs1s/dm5lEOxLIw73Qt1bP4C Qlwe7BKPRKFDYR0TEGTMw7r5w+/GcwzTfLt4jF19PPf3s8Bzeu1JRhlHJ 5toKFkDJqJxt2KgRssbbtdBFxitGik3DxTkMhtTJGbFigXYyRZfmK+6P6 udKcVIDIHDR02KTUBcmi+O+wAbBUWnGRZHmqbChkAnCEpYW5S3ww1ynC5 S577drFVcRrHh54vemkEycct/irWA5MSA9qHJ6n06H/Ebkl/DPmRYjNLj SA3mIBjf4UrCfEP8YDeMcArDEKLJm2hKp7nuZQ9tzdKzTQBq/z2gulyzz A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,422,1557158400"; d="scan'208";a="218020175" Received: from h199-255-45-14.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.14]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2019 10:18:38 +0800 IronPort-SDR: Etgl/ZFsNqgFjy1k+Q6uALRkqorriwzWpOEiL33wGew0nGkUmQi02F/zmmPqagcdO4KqGMkmV2 xx6F10y/WU1VG0EO+vClyYAYe7XN9Cy+J/HeP71XyUCu1oBEvPzC5hkuXKOUak5SGRKgH2Ygce tUyzpOpby3nda6HqhdYWaMApiKxlWxCP8wsSHbJ75jVFOBRllkCW+21pBUFVHKGINyUEXMHagX /IYAyypUk1zJdeJH+50tZgnAI08r8UbrclMnrgugF779VKoJ530NQN6KzGVbXVwKRWyPUc36Fp eW54F9wUMk4GEUt1KD6qG+ah Received: from uls-op-cesaip01.wdc.com ([10.248.3.36]) by uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2019 19:17:46 -0700 IronPort-SDR: ciLexNHCv6HL8MZuckFUeBuAAqxAHwDwL0T3akazDuuvQlT+UmUai8SZlQcgLlMo31DzQYCy9C hUmWFABApl4vhwrHwwwNgApIeFL7zgMAQsNfesmsMzYlcHY/bExk7+MCe6LFtwJP5mf9NcCS5I yosY85vqe7YCnHakfyQMwyQjzZEz/2iJf1D2qk2ScLEpepDs50z5eYX5Yas7bf4/E5rwInY8df VA2fHixn7pD+aJT3u6PzOm755RWHxstUQ+JkAIqkjoIGczFDwhyJa85Jy2zwmAziFv0/Njm1rR +rY= Received: from usa005100.ad.shared (HELO [10.225.99.96]) ([10.225.99.96]) by uls-op-cesaip01.wdc.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2019 19:18:37 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries To: Paul Walmsley , Sudeep Holla Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Catalin Marinas , "David S. Miller" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Cameron , Linus Walleij , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Rutland , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Morten Rasmussen , Otto Sabart , Palmer Dabbelt , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Richard Fontana , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Russell King References: <20190617185920.29581-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190617185920.29581-2-atish.patra@wdc.com> From: Atish Patra Message-ID: <873a80f0-e704-dd7e-4db9-b159b23847fc@wdc.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:18:36 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/26/19 5:31 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Sudeep, Atish, > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > >> From: Sudeep Holla >> >> The current ARM DT topology description provides the operating system >> with a topological view of the system that is based on leaf nodes >> representing either cores or threads (in an SMT system) and a >> hierarchical set of cluster nodes that creates a hierarchical topology >> view of how those cores and threads are grouped. >> >> However this hierarchical representation of clusters does not allow to >> describe what topology level actually represents the physical package or >> the socket boundary, which is a key piece of information to be used by >> an operating system to optimize resource allocation and scheduling. >> >> Lets add a new "socket" node type in the cpu-map node to describe the >> same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > This one doesn't apply cleanly here on top of v5.2-rc2, Linus's master > branch, and next-20190626. The reject file is below. Am I missing > a patch? > That's weird. I could apply the patch from any git tree (github or git.kernel.org) but not from mail or patchworks. git log doesn't show any recent modifications of that file. I am trying to figure out what's wrong. > > - Paul > > --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt > +++ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt > @@ -185,13 +206,15 @@ Bindings for cluster/cpu/thread nodes are defined as follows: > 4 - Example dts > =========================================== > > -Example 1 (ARM 64-bit, 16-cpu system, two clusters of clusters): > +Example 1 (ARM 64-bit, 16-cpu system, two clusters of clusters in a single > +physical socket): > > cpus { > #size-cells = <0>; > #address-cells = <2>; > > cpu-map { > + socket0 { > cluster0 { > cluster0 { > core0 { > -- Regards, Atish