From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S964878AbVLFBKT@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S964878AbVLFBKT (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:10:19 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964880AbVLFBKT
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:10:19 -0500
Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:48605 "EHLO mail.enyo.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964878AbVLFBKS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:10:18 -0500
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
       Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
       David Ranson <david@unsolicited.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de>
	<873bl76zd3.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<1133817679.6724.52.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<200512051709.08940.rob@landley.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0512051947070.29325@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:10:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0512051947070.29325@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (Steven
	Rostedt's message of "Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:54:26 -0500 (EST)")
Message-ID: <873bl72fpt.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Steven Rostedt:

>> Hint:  Any plan in a volunteer community that starts with "$BUSY_PEOPLE should
>> do $THIS" fails.  Any plan that starts with "I could do $THIS" at least has a
>> chance.
>
> Actually, they are already maintaining 2.6.x.y, (x => 11, 12, ...)

I think the 2.6.x.y series is no longer maintained once 2.6.x+1 has
been released for some time (surely after 2.6.x+2).