linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] genirq/affinity: Add irq_update_affinity_desc()
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:38:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874klmqu2r.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78356caa-57a0-b807-fe52-8f12d36c1789@huawei.com>

John,

On Wed, Nov 18 2020 at 11:34, John Garry wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * irq_update_affinity_desc - Update affinity management for an interrupt
>> + * @irq:	The interrupt number to update
>> + * @affinity:	Pointer to the affinity descriptor
>> + *
>> + * This interface can be used to configure the affinity management of
>> + * interrupts which have been allocated already.
>> + */
>> +int irq_update_affinity_desc(unsigned int irq,
>> +			     struct irq_affinity_desc *affinity)
>
> Just a note on the return value, in the only current callsite - 
> platform_get_irqs_affinity() - we don't check the return value and 
> propagate the error. This is because we don't want to fail the interrupt 
> init just because of problems updating the affinity mask. So I could 
> print a message to inform the user of error (at the callsite).

Well, not sure about that. During init on a platform which does not have
the issues with reservation mode there failure cases are:

 1) Interrupt does not exist. Definitely a full fail

 2) Interrupt is already started up. Not a good idea on init() and
    a clear fail.

 3) Interrupt has already been switched to managed. Double init is not
    really a good sign either.

>> +	/* Requires the interrupt to be shut down */
>> +	if (irqd_is_started(&desc->irq_data))
>
> We're missing the unlock here, right?

Duh yes.

>> +		return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> +	/* Interrupts which are already managed cannot be modified */
>> +	if (irqd_is_managed(&desc->irq_data))
>
> And here, and I figure that this should be irqd_affinity_is_managed()

More duh :)

I assume you send a fixed variant of this.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-28 12:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] Support managed interrupts for platform devices John Garry
2020-10-28 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] genirq/affinity: Add irq_update_affinity_desc() John Garry
2020-10-28 18:22   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-02 17:32     ` John Garry
2020-11-02 20:35       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-17 21:28         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-18 11:34           ` John Garry
2020-11-18 20:38             ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-11-19  9:31               ` John Garry
2020-11-19 18:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-19 19:56                   ` John Garry
2020-11-19 21:03                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-20 11:52                       ` John Garry
2020-11-22 13:38                         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 12:54                           ` John Garry
2020-11-23 13:26                             ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-23 15:45                               ` John Garry
2020-11-24 16:51                                 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 17:38                                   ` John Garry
2020-11-25 18:35                                     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 10:47                                       ` John Garry
2020-11-26 11:08                                         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 11:29                                           ` John Garry
2020-11-26 16:52                                             ` John Garry
2020-11-27  9:57                                               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-27 12:45                                                 ` John Garry
2020-11-27 12:49                                                   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-28 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Driver core: platform: Add platform_get_irqs_affinity() John Garry
2020-10-28 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: hisi_sas: Expose HW queues for v2 hw John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874klmqu2r.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).