From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272500AbTGaPCA (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:02:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272504AbTGaPCA (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:02:00 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:46085 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272500AbTGaPB7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:01:59 -0400 To: David Weinehall Cc: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, Ren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp() References: <20030727172150.15f8df7f.l.s.r@web.de> <87wue4udxl.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <200307311224.h6VCOMj19676@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <87r846yfag.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20030731140442.GE16315@khan.acc.umu.se> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 00:00:36 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20030731140442.GE16315@khan.acc.umu.se> Message-ID: <874r12yc4r.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Weinehall writes: > And how big is the performance loss? Is it even measurable? > And even if it is, is optimizing this really worth the trouble? 48bytes smaller than prev. I think It's not a clear reason for rejecting a patch. -- OGAWA Hirofumi