From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Eric W. Biederman) To: Kees Cook <email@example.com> Cc: Kyle Huey <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Linus Torvalds <email@example.com>, Andrea Righi <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Shuah Khan <email@example.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Andy Lutomirski <email@example.com>, Will Drewry <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "open list\:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <email@example.com>, bpf <firstname.lastname@example.org>, open list <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Robert O'Callahan <email@example.com> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 5.16rc1: SA_IMMUTABLE breaks debuggers Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:10:18 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <202111171728.D85A4E2571@keescook> (Kees Cook's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:32:20 -0800") Kees Cook <email@example.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:20:33PM -0800, Kyle Huey wrote: >> Yeah that's one way to solve the problem. I think you're right that >> fundamentally the problem here is that what SECCOMP_RET_KILL wants is >> not really a signal. To the extent that it wants a signal, what it >> really wants is SIGKILL, and the problem here is the code trying to >> act like SIGKILL but call it SIGSYS. I assume the ship for fixing that >> sailed years ago though. > > Yeah, this was IIRC, a specific design choice (to distinguish a seccomp > KILL from a SIGKILL), as desired by the sandboxing folks, and instead > of using two different signals (one for KILL and one for TRAP), both > used SIGSYS, with the KILL variant being uncatchable. I see a general consensus on how to fix the regression. Linus patch plus some tweaks. I will get to work on that today. For v5.15 I think all that needs to get fixed is what Linus fixed and the force_sigsegv case. That is my priority. For v5.16-rc1+ the instances that became force_fatal_signal need a careful review to figure out which semantics we want. Having a clear distinction between which forced signals we can let the debugger intercept and which ones we can not seems to be what needs to be added. Kyle thank you for your explanation of what breaks. For future kernels I do need to do some work in this area and I will copy on the patches going forward. In particular I strongly suspect that changing the sigaction and blocked state of the signal for these synchronous signals is the wrong thing to do, especially if the process is not killed. I want to find another solution that does not break things but that also does not change the program state behind the programs back so things work differently under the debugger. Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-18 16:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-17 18:47 Kyle Huey 2021-11-17 18:51 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-17 19:05 ` Kyle Huey 2021-11-17 19:09 ` Kyle Huey 2021-11-17 21:04 ` Eric W. Biederman 2021-11-17 21:54 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-17 23:24 ` Linus Torvalds 2021-11-18 0:05 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-18 0:15 ` Linus Torvalds 2021-11-18 0:37 ` Kyle Huey 2021-11-18 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds 2021-11-18 1:20 ` Kyle Huey 2021-11-18 1:32 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-18 16:10 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message] 2021-11-19 16:07 ` Kyle Huey 2021-11-19 16:35 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-19 16:58 ` Kyle Huey 2021-11-18 21:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] SA_IMMUTABLE fixes Eric W. Biederman 2021-11-18 22:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] signal: Don't always set SA_IMMUTABLE for forced signals Eric W. Biederman 2021-11-18 23:52 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-18 23:54 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-19 15:08 ` Eric W. Biederman 2021-11-19 1:13 ` Kyle Huey 2021-11-19 15:03 ` Eric W. Biederman 2021-11-18 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] signal: Replace force_fatal_sig with force_exit_sig when in doubt Eric W. Biederman 2021-11-18 23:53 ` Kees Cook 2021-11-19 1:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] SA_IMMUTABLE fixes Kyle Huey 2021-11-19 15:41 ` [GIT PULL] SA_IMMUTABLE fixes for v5.16-rc2 Eric W. Biederman 2021-11-19 19:46 ` pr-tracker-bot 2021-11-17 22:29 ` [REGRESSION] 5.16rc1: SA_IMMUTABLE breaks debuggers Kyle Huey 2021-11-18 5:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2021-11-20 6:13 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [REGRESSION] 5.16rc1: SA_IMMUTABLE breaks debuggers' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).