From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: checkpatch: Document some more message types
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:43:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875yulj4m8.fsf@meer.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210925201746.15917-1-utkarshverma294@gmail.com>
Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com> writes:
> Added and documented 3 new message types:
> - UNNECESSARY_INT
> - UNSPECIFIED_INT
> - UNNECESSARY_ELSE
>
> Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
So...when you send multiple patches with the same subject line that's
always a bad sign. We really want a "git --oneline" listing to give a
good idea of what the patch does, and that depends on more descriptive
subject lines.
In this case, something like:
docs: checkpatch: add UNNECESSARY/UNSPECIFIED_INT and UNNECESSARY_ELSE
I can fix up these two patches, but please try to keep this in mind for
future work.
(applying the patches now).
Thanks,
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-27 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-25 20:17 [PATCH] Documentation: checkpatch: Document some more message types Utkarsh Verma
2021-09-27 17:43 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2021-09-27 17:47 ` Utkarsh Verma
2021-09-27 17:53 ` Joe Perches
2021-10-01 12:02 ` [PATCH] docs: checkpatch: add UNNECESSARY_ELSE message Utkarsh Verma
2021-10-02 14:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Utkarsh Verma
2021-10-03 4:38 ` Dwaipayan Ray
2021-10-03 5:08 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2021-10-03 5:19 ` Utkarsh Verma
2021-10-03 5:31 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2021-10-03 5:23 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2021-10-01 19:09 ` [PATCH] Documentation: checkpatch: Document some more message types Utkarsh Verma
2021-10-01 19:26 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: add check for continue statement in UNNECESSARY_ELSE Utkarsh Verma
2021-10-01 20:22 ` Joe Perches
2021-10-01 20:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Utkarsh Verma
2021-10-01 21:09 ` Joe Perches
2021-10-02 14:02 ` [PATCH v3] " Utkarsh Verma
2021-10-03 5:12 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2021-09-29 5:28 ` [PATCH] Documentation: checkpatch: Document some more message types Lukas Bulwahn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-25 16:38 Utkarsh Verma
2021-09-17 10:15 Utkarsh Verma
2021-09-17 12:39 ` Dwaipayan Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875yulj4m8.fsf@meer.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=utkarshverma294@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).