From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F03DC6377C for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 22:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C64F60E0C for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 22:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230166AbhGUV7B (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:59:01 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:50068 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229684AbhGUV67 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:58:59 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1626907174; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sepRdW6Z8xUqeGbKVOlXDjKfLEa7g37H8/H5BHucBzk=; b=iE1g2bwW+vh0PxcRqxasorgULhpgA+baFNg+pthdb8hwv4jCLcskgHD7V1K6WWTDzWlzAO R5G7nEAlZn9FZgT9PAdROwPeE6PGqJEVSMVCDNOB+FXWGUps8Ey+0ZQaWDnZ0k9oeR4vfR +2blq7tajjhq2fiBxKynMuZ1MsQaK/MyuSJOHd/4MFPHFdcExS2C2xwaFS3am5ZqQnIftx YHUzjaLdRFss8fRMtxOhm+0xVUuh7XkSLT1DJHf1eAZ6HLT2EqLkMZjtfQV0La4kofwJok XsmVnGKDJI4kuMkHIP+5GpRN8TcbfPd26pY0SJwattzfCUU+Ly7+/V0TLR6vBw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1626907174; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sepRdW6Z8xUqeGbKVOlXDjKfLEa7g37H8/H5BHucBzk=; b=AXZrf7eg1fpSXzsQ/udt1aXb02LifqLGDkbR7NwAky0yHsQm4gw7WnHedaZYVdxccDQ6Hp Yp5SbBBQHpryDtBw== To: "Raj\, Ashok" Cc: LKML , Alex Williamson , "David S. Miller" , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Tian , Marc Zyngier , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Ashok Raj Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] PCI/MSI, x86: Cure a couple of inconsistencies In-Reply-To: <20210721211036.GA676232@otc-nc-03> References: <20210721191126.274946280@linutronix.de> <20210721211036.GA676232@otc-nc-03> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:39:29 +0200 Message-ID: <875yx3p9zy.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 14:10, Ashok Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:11:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> A recent discussion about the PCI/MSI management for virtio unearthed a > > nit: > virtio or VFIO? :-) VFIO of course.