linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linux <zhaoyan.liao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, dwmw@amazon.co.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	songmuchun@bytedance.com, likunkun@bytedance.com,
	guancheng.rjk@alibaba-inc.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use 64bit timer for hpet
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:25:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875yxgngct.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2CC6F5DA-B186-4A06-92B4-B763386F0D0A@linux.alibaba.com>

Liao,

On Mon, Jul 12 2021 at 12:52, Linux wrote:
>> Sorry, keeping the softirq from running for 3 minutes is simply out of
>> spec. If the sysadmin decides to do so, then he can keep the pieces.
>
> It is because the kernel thread is busy that the clocksource_watchdog 
> thread is not scheduled, not softirq.

Which thread?

The clocksource watchdog runs from a timer_list timer callback in
softirq context. Even if the softirq is switched to the softirq thread
then still my argument of starving that for 3 minutes still stands.

This is _not_ a kernel problem. Overcommitment is a admin problem.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-02  8:13 [PATCH] use 64bit timer for hpet zhaoyan.liao
2021-07-02 15:57 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-07 10:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-08  3:11   ` Linux
2021-07-08 11:17     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-12  4:52       ` Linux
2021-07-12  7:25         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-07-13  1:43           ` Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875yxgngct.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=guancheng.rjk@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=likunkun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=wenan.mao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhaoyan.liao@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).