linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/smp: Remove unused inline functions
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:01:53 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dlu8q4e.fsf@linkitivity.dja.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210324140752.11320-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>

Hi,

> commit 441c19c8a290 ("powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv: Rework the secondary inhibit code")
> left behind this, so can remove it.
>

Interesting: that commit removed some instances of
(un)inhibit_secondary_onlining, but it seems to have missed the ones for
the uni-processor case, which your patch removes. This seems like a good
change.

Checkpatch does have one small complaint about your commit message:

| WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
| #6: 
| commit 441c19c8a290 ("powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv: Rework the secondary inhibit code")

I don't think this warrants another revision, I think leaving the commit
name on one line makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>

Kind regards,
Daniel

> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> index 7a13bc20f0a0..ad7129a19e8f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -189,8 +189,6 @@ extern void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
>  #define hard_smp_processor_id()		get_hard_smp_processor_id(0)
>  #define smp_setup_cpu_maps()
>  #define thread_group_shares_l2  0
> -static inline void inhibit_secondary_onlining(void) {}
> -static inline void uninhibit_secondary_onlining(void) {}
>  static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_sibling_mask(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return cpumask_of(cpu);
> -- 
> 2.17.1

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26  5:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24 14:07 [PATCH -next] powerpc/smp: Remove unused inline functions YueHaibing
2021-03-26  5:01 ` Daniel Axtens [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-11 12:51 YueHaibing
2022-03-11 13:33 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-15  3:09 YueHaibing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dlu8q4e.fsf@linkitivity.dja.id.au \
    --to=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).