From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] rtmutex wait_lock is irq safe
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 15:02:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877enrwljy.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180525090507.22248-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de> (Anna-Maria Gleixner's message of "Fri, 25 May 2018 11:05:05 +0200")
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> writes:
> Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the rtmutex
> wait_lock is irq safe. Therefore the irqsave/restore in kernel/signal is no
> longer required (see Patch 2/2). During discussions about v1 of this patch,
> Eric Biederman noticed, that there is a no longer valid rcu_read_unlock()
> documentation.
>
> Therefore sending a short queue: fixing first the documentation of
> rcu_read_unlock() and afterwards removing irqsave/restore in
> kernel/signal.
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> v1..v2:
>
> - Add new patch updating rcu documentation as suggested by Eric Biederman
> - Udpate commit message of kernel/signal patch
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anna-Maria
>
>
> Anna-Maria Gleixner (2):
> rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()
> signal: Remove no longer required irqsave/restore
>
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 +---
> kernel/signal.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-25 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-25 9:05 [PATCH v2 0/2] rtmutex wait_lock is irq safe Anna-Maria Gleixner
2018-05-25 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock() Anna-Maria Gleixner
2018-05-25 14:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-28 9:49 ` Anna-Maria Gleixner
2018-06-10 4:18 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Anna-Maria Gleixner
2018-05-25 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] signal: Remove no longer required irqsave/restore Anna-Maria Gleixner
2018-06-10 4:19 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Anna-Maria Gleixner
2018-05-25 20:02 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877enrwljy.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).