From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751517AbdFGODc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:03:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55748 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751454AbdFGODb (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 10:03:31 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com E2BAA3DBE0 Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vkuznets@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com E2BAA3DBE0 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Steven Rostedt Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jork Loeser , Simon Xiao , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] tracing/hyper-v: trace hyperv_mmu_flush_tlb_others() References: <20170524120405.19079-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20170524120405.19079-11-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20170605115048.472b5cfa@gandalf.local.home> <87tw3u76gz.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20170607095206.6e411c51@gandalf.local.home> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 16:03:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170607095206.6e411c51@gandalf.local.home> (Steven Rostedt's message of "Wed, 7 Jun 2017 09:52:06 -0400") Message-ID: <877f0nuc7l.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Steven Rostedt writes: >> >> I'm pretty sure I tested tracing this even before sending v2 of this >> series, I'll retest before sending v7. > > Even if it does work, it's still fragile as it uses an > no-longer-supported framework. > I hope I fixed it in v7 of my patchset, it would be great if you could take a look. Thanks! -- Vitaly