From: Alex Romosan <romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: shawvrana@acm.org, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, plazmcman@softhome.net
Subject: Re: Screwy clock after apm suspend
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:15:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877jmm2fnb.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050109224711.GF1353@elf.ucw.cz> (message from Pavel Machek on Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:47:11 +0100)
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:
>> Just thought I'd add that I too am seeing a big time drift on my
>> Thinkpad (T30) without ACPI during an APM suspend w/ 2.6.10. If I can
>> help by testing patches, or providing any additional information,
>> please let me know.
>
> Probably code to compensate clock after ACPI suspend breaks apm case
> :-(.
i see problems with the clock after doing an acpi suspend. the
hardware clock is more or less okay (within a few minutes of the real
time anyway, nothing that ntp can't take care of) but the system time
is way off. this first started happening with 2.6.10-rc1. by now i've
gotten into the habit of running 'hwclock -s' by hand after each
resume. not really sure what changed and what i can do to debug/fix
this. for all it's worth i am running debian unstable.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion |
| and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-10 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-07 18:08 Screwy clock after apm suspend Shaw
2005-01-09 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 2:15 ` Alex Romosan [this message]
2005-01-10 7:28 ` Shaw
2005-01-10 7:44 ` bernard
2005-01-10 10:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 17:48 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-01-11 0:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 1:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-11 3:12 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 1:16 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-01-11 3:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 12:36 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-11 13:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 14:15 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-11 20:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 3:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-01-11 3:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-11 12:32 ` Mikael Pettersson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-15 18:30 Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-16 19:47 ` Alex Romosan
2004-12-29 11:38 Mikael Pettersson
2005-01-03 17:34 ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-29 0:29 Brannon Klopfer
2004-12-29 1:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877jmm2fnb.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov \
--to=romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=plazmcman@softhome.net \
--cc=shawvrana@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).