From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FEEC4338F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE3560D07 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231468AbhGYTIt (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:08:49 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:35848 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230116AbhGYTIs (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:08:48 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1627242557; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tLUaa2kek2tqz2VvunMsn2pCNlPFhTozIDZBme0oKhw=; b=4gOfKz4NsVSYYgOBQFhH4sgHl6ljb5yF2frHz0MWF5G1DPRwekpyRc03bQc54nzUMSQ6+R qHiWw9toLjetdCwGDAhcyQTeUlmhah5dgZRrgLCgWpIpDIyJo9cvtvy/u0yYUbJH5LkNUN ZnK0T/uqvwx9isqMVwrhMEqMA0y9LBZHpyfijWCIaHaPZVPhUtMydNGjezF4W2BM6KNMAl 4V3yU9aVg88cBLLXY7exSAFQESx8VJOrV8is1SzHJM0hBQ22gEyeA142tOuGtjSnGk6O6g y38rY57+oxJaxnXPzIiLsu/+V160k9WVnxAi9nJd58I3QPSJ/px5GEFwPzGo3w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1627242557; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tLUaa2kek2tqz2VvunMsn2pCNlPFhTozIDZBme0oKhw=; b=EoSIkCPx/j8YQ8ZoZThOLTDm6nTGS5pFMDcc2ufIS7o2hLBZvtL1bOqNkZ7e0lzXCjGlA7 ADz9ozdiymXLlLDw== To: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [GIT pull] core/urgent for v5.14-rc3 In-Reply-To: References: <162720492071.8837.4047241618315201209.tglx@nanos> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 21:49:16 +0200 Message-ID: <878s1unphf.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 25 2021 at 11:06, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 2:23 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > So that function definition _should_ have been > > static __always_inline void idle_init(unsigned int cpu) > > instead. > > Oh well. I'll fix it up as a separate patch. I wish I had done the > clang build before pushing it out - and I wish the -tip tree started > tested clang as well at least in _some_ configuration. Bah, obvious and I overlooked it when staring at the diff. Duly noted that clang will be part of the procedure soonish. Thanks, tglx