From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF81C2BB9A for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542C023A79 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729876AbgLHOiU (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:38:20 -0500 Received: from so254-31.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.31]:48230 "EHLO so254-31.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729833AbgLHOiS (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:38:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1607438273; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=wiV0QTircYBZpIpZ7N0y4YXP4M00dXIopNRPONBsgZU=; b=P3oBCUqgiVTbioDYFMityKhcJu9TYIu2rXu5pQGyCMl/6fnViMyHtjPfdFLv/ZdfI4kwy/rK h6LVSC28/+pgUuQYwxS9oXjw71L4v0vY3C7C0UxpyvoXRVNoMyy92YH5Jm9+YgytZwZtpvA2 YLSWn9LX/StnDEvsYWw7Kj1ijYI= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.31 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n01.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5fcf8fa68b2b8953181467dc (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 14:37:26 GMT Sender: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 46898C433C6; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tynnyri.adurom.net (tynnyri.adurom.net [51.15.11.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E6E8C433CA; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:37:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7E6E8C433CA Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Srinivasan Raju Cc: mostafa.afgani@purelifi.com, Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Lukas Bulwahn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list), linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)), netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v11] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi STA devices References: <20200928102008.32568-1-srini.raju@purelifi.com> <20201208115719.349553-1-srini.raju@purelifi.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:37:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20201208115719.349553-1-srini.raju@purelifi.com> (Srinivasan Raju's message of "Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:27:04 +0530") Message-ID: <878sa84b4y.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Srinivasan Raju writes: > This introduces the pureLiFi LiFi driver for LiFi-X, LiFi-XC > and LiFi-XL USB devices. > > This driver implementation has been based on the zd1211rw driver. > > Driver is based on 802.11 softMAC Architecture and uses > native 802.11 for configuration and management. > > The driver is compiled and tested in ARM, x86 architectures and > compiled in powerpc architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Raju Please limit how often you send a new version of this driver. It does not speed up the review, quite the opposite actually as you just flood the patchwork (and my inbox). Especially if there are only cosmetic changes there's no point of sending a new version immediately, only send a new version when there are major changes. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches