From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: Properly handle kvm_read/write_guest_virt*() result
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:20:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sgyc6jn.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605200651.GC11449@linux.intel.com>
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 01:59:05PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Introduce vmx_handle_memory_failure() as an interim solution.
>
> Heh, "interim". I'll take the over on that :-D.
>
We just need a crazy but real use-case to start acting :-)
>> Note, nested_vmx_get_vmptr() now has three possible outcomes: OK, PF,
>> KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR and callers need to know if userspace exit is
>> needed (for KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR) in case of failure. We don't seem
>> to have a good enum describing this tristate, just add "int *ret" to
>> nested_vmx_get_vmptr() interface to pass the information.
On a loosely related note, while writing this patch I was struggling
with our exit handlers calling convention (that the return value is '1'
- return to the guest, '0' - return to userspace successfully, '< 0' -
return to userspace with an error). This is intertwined with normal
int/bool functions and make it hard to read. At the very minimum we can
introduce an enum for 0/1 return values from exit handlers. Or, maybe,
we can introduce KVM_REQ_USERSPACE_EXIT/KVM_REQ_INTERNAL_ERROR/.. and
make all the exit handlers normal functions returning 0/error?
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+2a7156e11dc199bdbd8a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> +/*
>> + * Handles kvm_read/write_guest_virt*() result and either injects #PF or returns
>> + * KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR for cases not currently handled by KVM. Return value
>> + * indicates whether exit to userspace is needed.
>> + */
>> +int vmx_handle_memory_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int r,
>> + struct x86_exception *e)
>> +{
>> + if (r == X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT) {
>> + kvm_inject_emulated_page_fault(vcpu, e);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In case kvm_read/write_guest_virt*() failed with X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED
>> + * while handling a VMX instruction KVM could've handled the request
>
> A nit similar to your observation on the shortlog, this isn't limited to VMX
> instructions.
>
Yea, it all started with nested_vmx_get_vmptr() then Paolo discovered
vmwrite/vmread/vmptrst/invept/invvpid and then I discovered invpcid but
forgot to update the comment ...
>> + * correctly by exiting to userspace and performing I/O but there
>> + * doesn't seem to be a real use-case behind such requests, just return
>> + * KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR for now.
>> + */
>> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + vcpu->run->internal.suberror = KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION;
>> + vcpu->run->internal.ndata = 0;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-08 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-05 11:59 [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: Properly handle kvm_read/write_guest_virt*() result Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-06-05 11:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "KVM: x86: work around leak of uninitialized stack contents" Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-06-05 17:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-05 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: Properly handle kvm_read/write_guest_virt*() result Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-06-05 20:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-08 8:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878sgyc6jn.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).