From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B674BCA90AF for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F100206F5 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727998AbgELQb1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 12:31:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57218 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726558AbgELQb1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 12:31:27 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A5FC061A0C for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 09:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXnz-0000EL-PC; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:30:56 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C90951004DE; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:30:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Alexandre Chartre , LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Andy Lutomirski , Frederic Weisbecker , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Masami Hiramatsu , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Joel Fernandes , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Brian Gerst , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 5 07/31] x86/entry: Provide idtentry_entry/exit_cond_rcu() In-Reply-To: <72cb3e24-3f82-7e2a-7630-233749c780c4@oracle.com> References: <20200505135341.730586321@linutronix.de> <20200505135828.808686575@linutronix.de> <72cb3e24-3f82-7e2a-7630-233749c780c4@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:30:54 +0200 Message-ID: <878shx5d4x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexandre Chartre writes: > On 5/5/20 3:53 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> The pagefault handler cannot use the regular idtentry_enter() because on >> that invokes rcu_irq_enter() the pagefault was caused in the kernel. > > I am struggling to understand this part of the sentence: "because on > that invokes rcu_irq_enter() the pagefault was caused in the kernel." > > Do you mean: "because that invokes rcu_irq_enter() if the pagefault was > caused in the kernel." ? Yeah. Wordsalad ...