From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AC6C43331 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 23:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F99D2072E for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 23:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390277AbgDBXrt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:47:49 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:38236 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390216AbgDBXrt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:47:49 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jK9Yp-0003DI-Ln; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 17:47:47 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jK9Yp-00016u-0V; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 17:47:47 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alexey Gladkov References: <87blobnq02.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87lfnda3w3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:45:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Bernd Edlinger's message of "Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:42:24 +0200") Message-ID: <87a73ta1vj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1jK9Yp-00016u-0V;;;mid=<87a73ta1vj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18IyGJf88V8fzocU4wc7GQSMsf0+8gsUZE= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull proc and exec work for 5.7-rc1 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bernd Edlinger writes: > oh, sorry for that, that was requested in the peer review, I could not > get a patch approved that does not have such a boolean, that simplified > the error handling. If you had included a note in your changlog when you respun my patch I probably would have realized what you had done I would have spotted it faster. When I glanced at the patch quickly I thought you had just added the missing unlock. Eric