linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] sched/isolation: isolate from handling managed interrupt
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 23:15:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a75zz2hl.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203192154.GG155875@xz-x1>

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> The new "managed_irq" works for us, thanks for both of your work!
>
> However I just noticed that this new sub-parameter might break users
> if applied incorrectly to old kernels, because iiuc "isolcpus="
> parameter will not apply at all when there's unknown sub-parameters:
>
> static int __init housekeeping_isolcpus_setup(char *str)
> {
> 	unsigned int flags = 0;
>
> 	while (isalpha(*str)) {
>                 ...
>                 pr_warn("isolcpus: Error, unknown flag\n");
>                 return 0;
>         }
>         ...
> }
>
> Then the same kernel parameter will break isolcpus= if the user
> reboots and switches to an older kernel.
>
> A solution to this could be that we introduce an isolated parameter
> for "managed_irq", then on the old kernels only the new parameter will
> be ignored rather than the whole "isolcpus=" parameter, so nothing
> will break.
>
> I'm not sure whether it's already too late for this, or if there's any
> better alternative.  Just raise this question up to see whether we
> still have chance to fix this up.

No, really. The basic guarantee is that your new kernel is going to work
fine with the previous command line, but making a guarantee that new
command line options still work on an old kernel are just creating a
horrible mess. So if that command line interface was not designed to
handle unknown arguments in the first place, you better fix that.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20  9:16 [PATCH V4] sched/isolation: isolate from handling managed interrupt Ming Lei
2020-01-22 13:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-03 19:21   ` Peter Xu
2020-02-03 23:15     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-02-03 23:57       ` Peter Xu
2020-02-04  9:13         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-22 15:34 ` [tip: irq/core] genirq, sched/isolation: Isolate from handling managed interrupts tip-bot2 for Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a75zz2hl.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).