From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F028FC43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42FB2077B for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727919AbfLDN3H (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:29:07 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:57022 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727530AbfLDN3H (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:29:07 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=vostro.local) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1icUi2-0000ZT-Cy; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:28:50 +0100 From: John Ogness To: Petr Mladek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrea Parri , Thomas Gleixner , Sergey Senozhatsky , Brendan Higgins , kexec@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 2/3] printk-rb: new printk ringbuffer implementation (reader) References: <20191128015235.12940-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> <20191128015235.12940-3-john.ogness@linutronix.de> <20191203120622.zux33do54rmjafns@pathway.suse.cz> <87pnh5bjz4.fsf@linutronix.de> <20191204125450.ob5b7xi3gevor4qz@pathway.suse.cz> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:28:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191204125450.ob5b7xi3gevor4qz@pathway.suse.cz> (Petr Mladek's message of "Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:54:50 +0100") Message-ID: <87a788fcdr.fsf@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-12-04, Petr Mladek wrote: >> + } else if ((DATA_WRAPS(data_ring, blk_lpos->begin) + 1 == >> + DATA_WRAPS(data_ring, blk_lpos->next)) || >> + ((DATA_WRAPS(data_ring, blk_lpos->begin) == >> + DATA_WRAPS(data_ring, -1UL)) && >> + (DATA_WRAPS(data_ring, blk_lpos->next) == 0))) { > > I wonder if the following might be easier to understand even for > people like me ;-) > > } else if (DATA_WRAPS(data_ring, blk_lpos->begin + DATA_SIZE(data_ring)) == > DATA_WRAPS(data_ring, blk_lpos->next)) { Yes, this is clear and covers both cases. Thanks. John